My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5J - Rezoning from Rural Residential to Transition Residential, Johnson
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2006
>
05-18-2006 Planning Commission Meeting
>
5J - Rezoning from Rural Residential to Transition Residential, Johnson
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2016 11:12:58 AM
Creation date
6/16/2016 11:12:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. The Transition Residential zone is compatible with the Agriculture, Forest Management, <br /> Rural Residential,Recreation,Zones. <br /> �-- 5. The Rural Residential Zone is compatible with Forest Management, Recreation, <br /> Agriculture, and Transition Residential zones, although cannot be entirely surrounded <br /> by Forestry and Agriculture. <br /> 6. The property was zoned Rural Residential under the previous ordinance and had a <br /> minimum lot size of 5 acres, and the Transitional Residential District lot minimum size <br /> is the same. Therefore proposed rezoning would be an equal lot size minimum <br /> requirement from the previous zoning classification and will not result in a downzoning. <br /> 7. Rezoning to Rural Residential would be consistent with the development opportunities <br /> available to the property owners under the previous Ordinance. <br /> 8. The property meets the minimum lot size for the Transitional Residential zone, being <br /> roughly 22 acres in size. <br /> g. The property meets the minimum lot width for both the Transitional Residential zone, <br /> being over 200 feet wide on both street frontages. <br /> io. The property meets the minimum lot size for the Rural Residential zone, which requires <br /> a minimum of five buildable acres. <br /> u. The landowner's stated desire to, at minimum, zone Soo' along County Highway ii to <br /> Commercial would also be inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Future <br /> Land Use Map, which designates this area as an Urban/Rural Transition area. The <br /> partial commercial zoning would also be considered to be spot zoning and inconsistent <br /> with the immediate surrounding land use pattern. This is particularly the case,given the <br /> Future Land Use Map designation,the present zoning of existing adjacent properties and <br /> the lack of any clear development plan or proposal for the property. <br /> 12. The property immediately adjacent to the east is has been rezoned to Rural Residential <br /> and properly reflects an established development pattern of large lot rural residential <br /> housing. The larger property to the north has been rezoned to Agricultural to reflect its <br /> present land use. The street pattern in the development adjacent to the east, however, <br /> �.., would potentially support a similar extension of this existing street pattern to the west <br /> and therefore lends further support to a consistency pattern for future low density <br /> residential development on both the subject property and on the agricultural land to the <br /> north. <br /> 13. The Commercial zone is not compatible with the surrounding land uses, as Section 5.10 <br /> of the Ordinance states that the zone may not be established in area that is entirely <br /> surrounded by residential zones. The Ordinance also states that the Commercial zone <br /> should serve as a transition between the Downtown Mixed Use zone or the Light <br /> Industrial zone and the surrounding residential zones, neither of which are located <br /> adjacent to the subject property. <br /> Planning Commission Direction: The Planning Commission can recommend that the City <br /> Council approve,deny,or table this rezoning. <br /> Staff Recommendation: This property is similar to that of the previous hearing. Although <br /> the Future Land Use map designates this property as Urban/Rural Transition, the Transition <br /> Residential zone would not be an appropriate designation.This property does not lie within the <br /> project utility service area, as required under the purpose and intent for the Transition <br /> Residential zone. Rezoning to Commercial would be inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive <br /> Plan and Future Land Use map, as well as incompatible with the surrounding zoning <br /> classifications.The Staff,therefore,recommends rezoning this property to Rural Residential. <br /> City of Pequot Lakes Staff Report 12_3 <br /> May18,2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.