Laserfiche WebLink
PEQUOT LAKES POLICE DEPARTMENT <br /> SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT <br /> ICR: 06000565 <br /> OFFICER: NANGLE DATE: 4-16-06 <br /> SUBJECT: KEVIN JOHN NELSON TIME: 1800HRS <br /> DOB: 12-4-56 LOCATION: 31056 SPRUCE ST <br /> ADDRESS: 31056 SPRUCE ST CHARGES: DOG AT LARGE <br /> ORD 164.5 <br /> DETAILS OF INCIDENT: <br /> ON 4-11-06 AT 1600HRS I, OFFICER CHAD NANGLE, WAS INFORMED BY CHIEF BRAAM <br /> OF A DOG AT LARGE INCIDENT IN THE CITY. THIS INCIDENT OCCURRED AT APPROXIAMETLY <br /> 0640HRS ON 4-11-06. THE DOGS ARE OWNED BY KEVIN NELSON. CHIEF BRAAM WOULD LIKE <br /> ME TO GO TO NELSONS RESIDENCE TO SEE IF HE IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DOG <br /> ORDINANCE. IF HE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE I AM TO ISSUE HIM A CITATION FOR DOGS AT <br /> LARGE. <br /> AT THAT TIME I DID NOT HAVE A CURRENT COPY OF THE CITY'S DOG ORDINANCE <br /> AND OUR OFFICE MANAGER WAS UNABLE TO LACATE ONE FOR ME. <br /> WHEN I RETURNED TO DUTY ON 4-14-06 A COPY OF THE ORDINANCE WAS IN MY BOX. <br /> DURING MY SHIFTS ON 4-14/4-151 WAS UNABLE TO MAKE CONTACT WITH NELSON. <br /> ON 4-16-06 AT APPROXIEMETLY 1800HR I DROVE BY THE NELSON RESIDENCE ON <br /> SPRUCE STREET AND OBSERVED TWO BLACK DOGS LAYING IN NELSONS YARD. I DROVE <br /> AROUND THE BLOCK AND THROUGH THE ALLEY BEHIND NELSONS HOUSE. THE TWO DOGS <br /> WHATCHED AS I DROVE BY. THE DOGS WERE NOT TIED UP IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY <br /> ORDINANCE AND I COULD NOT SEE IF THEY WERE WEARING AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE. I <br /> CONTINUED PAST THE RESIDENCE AND TURNED AROUND AND DROVE BACK TO THE <br /> RESIDENCE. AS I SLOWED DOWN BOTH DOGS GOT UP AND BEGAN BARKING. THEY RAN <br /> TOWARDS MY SQAUD BARKING ALL THE WAY UP TO MY SQAUD. AS THEY APPROACHED <br /> THE SQAUD A FEMALE CAME OUT OF THE HOUSE AND CALLED THEM BACK AND INTO THE <br /> HOUSE. WHEN THE DOGS WERE IN THE HOUSE I EXITED MY SQAUD AND ASKED THE <br /> FEMALE IF KEVIN NELSON WAS THERE. AT THAT TIME NELSON CAME OUT OF THE HOUSE. <br /> NELSON APPROACHED ME AND ASKED IF I WAS HERE BECAUSE OF THE DOGS. I <br /> STATED THAT I WAS. I ASKED NELSON IF HE HAD A ROPE OR CHAINS TO SECURE THE <br /> DOGS, HE STATED THAT HE DID NOT. NELSON SAID THAT HE IS WORKING ON FENCE BUT IT <br /> WOULD NOT BE READY FOR SIX WEEKS. I TOLD NELSON THAT WOULD NOT BE A CURE FOR <br /> THE PROBLEM RIGHT NOW. 1 TOLD NELSON ABOUT THE INCIDENT ON 4-11-06 AND THAT IF <br /> HE WAS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY ORDINANCE ABOUT DOGS NOT BEING TIED UP <br /> THAT I WOULD HAVE TO ISSUE HIM A CITATION. NELSON ASKED IF I COULD GIVE HIM A <br /> WARNING. I REMINDED NELSON THAT OFFICER HOGAN HAS ALREADY WARNED HIM AND <br /> GIVEN HIM A COPY OF THE ORDINANCE. NELSON THEN ASKED IF I COULD GIVE HIM A <br /> WRITTEN WARNING. I TOLD NELSON THAT HE HAS HAD ENOUGH WARNINGS. NELSON <br /> STATED THAT HE WAS AWARE THE HIS DOGS RUN AWAY FROM HIS PROPERTY AND IT HAS <br /> BEEN AN ON GOING PROBLEM. <br />