My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6A - Development Bonds Discussion
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2007
>
05-17-2007 Planning Commission Meeting
>
6A - Development Bonds Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2016 9:53:41 AM
Creation date
6/15/2016 9:53:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The obvious downside of requiring the financial security is that it increases the overall cost of <br /> the development and adds to the complexity of the review process. While in and of themselves <br /> these are not reasons to forgo a bond,they should be a consideration when determining whether <br /> or not to require a security and, if so,how much. There is no need to add costs to a project if we <br /> are otherwise assured performance. <br /> We request that the Planning Commission discuss this item and provide some direction to staff. <br /> We will then draft a formal policy on interpreting what a "required improvement" would be so <br /> that we have that for all new subdivisions. <br /> City of Pequot Lakes Staff Report 4_2 <br /> May r7,200'7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.