My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3B - Variance for a Sign Exceeding the Height Limit
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2007
>
05-17-2007 Planning Commission Meeting
>
3B - Variance for a Sign Exceeding the Height Limit
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2016 9:53:30 AM
Creation date
6/15/2016 9:53:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pursuant to the Pequot Lakes City Ordinance, Section 170.040, the applicant should be prepared at <br /> the public hearing to explain the unique hardship for the proposed variance. A hardship is defined <br /> as a condition whereby the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br /> conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances <br /> unique to his property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute a hardship if <br /> reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Ordinance. <br /> (1) What are the unique circumstances of the parcel size, shape, topography or other <br /> characteristics that make strict interpretation off thn Ordinance impractical? <br /> rt - <br /> 5 � <br /> with 'intent f the i of Pe not Lakes Land Use`s <br /> (_) How is granting this variance consistent with the to t o e C ry q <br /> or Subdivision O dinance? <br /> C42J M v 7 <br /> e- V( CP i- . <br /> (3) How will reasonable/use of the parcel be deprived if the variance is not gra ted? <br /> xa <br /> 2Y op Z)a i S <br /> (4) What other options, either conforming or non-conforming, have been considered and why <br /> were thos options not chosen? <br /> Me Slav) '�ej/l /)D <br /> (5) Describe the impact on the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity. If <br /> there is no impact, explain why. <br /> ZIP <br /> Ze <br /> J <br /> REV: JAN 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.