Laserfiche WebLink
7. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the <br /> community as it is a reuse of existing property. No additional public services or <br /> facilities are required for the proposed use. <br /> 8. The applicant proposes to access this property from Government Drive using <br /> existing parking and access points established by the property owner/develop of <br /> the building. The proposed use should not create traffic congestion or interference <br /> with traffic on the surrounding streets. <br /> 9. The site of the proposed use contains existing parking facilities and has sufficient <br /> parking for the proposed use. The applicant estimates the studio space will have a <br /> single class with 10 — 15 people on average during the b st times in the winter <br /> and in the evenings. Applicant estimates the classes 9 minutes in length, <br /> allowing time for people to leave and clear p\ spaces. The applicant <br /> estimates that, during the summer, the usage oft �tu�„',�, ace and Snap Fitness <br /> will decrease by one-third the normal level, to 0, like facilities. This <br /> overlaps City peak tourist season and sh 'mss st in the ' vision of ample <br /> parking spaces. ` <br /> 10. The proposed use is unlikely to prod se, duke or odors at a at would <br /> constitute a nuisance. The use is contain n isting build and so will <br /> also not produce any noise, dust, or odors n fy associated with construction <br /> activities. :. <br /> 11. The proposed use is containe an existing tur and will not result in <br /> the destruction or removal or an . historic si e' major significance. <br /> 12. The proposed use is contained hin g s cture and will not require <br /> additional storm w z managemen ove <br /> During discussion, \ing of is was ad sed. Applicants stated that music is <br /> played, it cannot be from side, but th ce next to them would be informed. <br /> All membe ye. on c <br /> mom <br /> AP T: City of not L es <br /> Applican ests an O ance amendment establishing new criteria for Park <br /> Dedication. r <br /> Mr. Marohn explai Staff Report. He stated that not many municipalities have <br /> addressed the chang State Statute. The use of a formula instead of numbers was <br /> discussed. The fees in the Ordinance would be changed by public hearing yearly. The <br /> 10%cap in No. 3 was discussed. Staff was directed to include a Park Plan in the 2008 <br /> budget, modify the Comprehensive Plan and work with the Park Board to establish a Park <br /> Plan. <br /> The Planning Commission has used the following formula to calculate park dedication <br /> requirements. The numbers used in this calculation are to be updated on an annual basis, <br /> as reflected in the amended Ordinance below. <br /> Minutes 2 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> June 21, 2007 <br />