My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4A - Amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for the RV Resort Village at the Preserve
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2007
>
02-15-2007 Planning Commission Meeting
>
4A - Amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for the RV Resort Village at the Preserve
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2016 12:56:06 PM
Creation date
6/13/2016 12:49:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
options of surrounding parcels makes this parcel suitable for the proposed approach. <br /> 29.The parcel is over 56 acres and is non-riparian. It is identified in the Recreational <br /> Vehicle Resort Overlay District as being suitable for the style of proposed <br /> development. <br /> On the CUP Evaluation <br /> 30.The proposed development is an appropriate use in the AG zone within the <br /> Recreational Vehicle Resort Overlay District. <br /> 31. The proposed development does not conflict with the City of Pequot Lakes Land Use <br /> Plan. As indicated in the EAW,the development is consistent with the direction of <br /> the Comprehensive Plan,specifically: <br /> A. The property has a high-redevelopment potential (page 25). This proposal <br /> corrects a market imbalance in a manner that is consistent with the other <br /> aspects of the plan. <br /> B. The development will serve seniors in a way the responds to the anticipated <br /> demands for developments with high-amenities (page 26). This development <br /> contains a number of recreational amenities on site, as well as facilitates a <br /> recreational lifestyle that will appeal to seniors. <br /> C. The development provides for increased economic development opportunities <br /> by responding to the aging and shifting demographics (page 33) identified in <br /> the plan. <br /> D. The development aids in creating the transient population needed to support <br /> a destination downtown(page 37). <br /> E. The project site does not contain any rare species habitat (page 43) or <br /> significant forested areas (page 45). The development avoids significant <br /> and/or sensitive natural resources and is in a suitable area with proper soil <br /> and slope characteristics(page 56). <br /> F. The proposed development retains the existing natural features on the <br /> property by avoiding areas of greatest topographic change and wetlands on <br /> the property (page 56). This is done through clustering of development on <br /> those parts of the site most suitable for development. <br /> G. The advanced sewage treatment proposed for the site is a sustainable <br /> approach that is encouraged in the plan(page 56). <br /> H. The proposed development increases the private recreational opportunities <br /> available within the City(page 64 and 65). <br /> I. The proposed development creates a private resort,which provides affordable <br /> recreational opportunities(page 65). <br /> J. The proposal is along an existing roadway corridor and makes use of existing <br /> transportation infrastructure(page 73). <br /> K. The sewage treatment system proposed for the development will be clustered <br /> and managed by a licensed operator(page 8o). <br /> 32.The proposed use of an RV resort, with appropriate conditions, is compatible with <br /> the existing neighborhood. Many of the surrounding properties are undeveloped and <br /> are zoned for forest management and long-term, low density development. The <br /> overlay district indicates the compatibility of this style of development with the <br /> adjacent land uses. <br /> 33•The proposed use,with conditions, will not be injurious to the public health, safety, <br /> welfare,decency,order,comfort,convenience,appearance,or prosperity of the City. <br /> 34•A letter has been submitted by Jeff Oelke with comments on the EAW. The concerns <br /> expressed by Mr. Oelke are addressed through this permitting process and the EAW <br /> response. <br /> 35•The proposed use will not impede the normal and orderly development and <br /> improvement of surrounding properties. These properties are mostly large-tract <br /> City of Pequot Lakes Staff Report 1-3 <br /> February 15,2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.