Laserfiche WebLink
Pequot Lakes <br /> Hwy 371 Alternate Route <br /> Joint Committee of the City Council and Planning Commission <br /> April 3, 2007 <br /> plant's (WWTP's) spray irrigation fields. <br /> As background, the WWTP consists of aerated stabilization ponds that detain, <br /> hold, and allow "bugs" to treat the wastewater. This treated wastewater is then <br /> disposed of via the pivot spray irrigators onto the fields east of the Paul Bunyan <br /> Trail and south of Derksen Road. <br /> The amount of spray irrigation land impacted would depend on the final location <br /> of the alternate route, the configuration of whatever at-grade intersection (I <br /> understand a bridged interchange is not part of the proposed improvements <br /> anymore) may be placed in this area, service roads that may be constructed, and <br /> any stormwater infiltration basins needed for the highway. One estimate of spray <br /> irrigation land impacted by an alternate route that MnDOT about 6 months ago, <br /> without service roads or stormwater basins, was about 17 acres. <br /> For reference purposes, the City's present permit allows spaying on about 100 <br /> acres. The City actually has more acres than this, but would have to rearrange <br /> the pivot spray irrigators to reach that land. <br /> With an impact of about 17 acres, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency said <br /> that the City may be able to increase their irrigation rate on the roughly 83 acres <br /> not impacted by the alternate route, or use other parts of the land it already owns <br /> to make up the roughly 17 acres impacted. <br /> While the indications at this time are that an alternate route does not present any <br /> insurmountable challenges in dealing with the initial impact on the_City's spray <br /> irrigation field, we would anticipate that an intersection in this area would induce <br /> development pressure that will have to be addressed. <br /> To what extent does an alternate route limit future expansion of the <br /> wastewater treatment system? <br /> We do not see a proposed alternate route significantly limiting future expansion <br /> of the City's wastewater treatment plant's (WWTP's) stabilization ponds or spray <br /> irrigation fields. <br /> We would not anticipate a future expansion of the stabilization ponds or the spray <br /> irrigation fields towards the City's Industrial/Business Park, which is also the <br /> same direction as the proposed alternate route. <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> CADocuments and Settings\Canal Park Location\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK4B\040207- <br /> Joint Council and PZ.doc <br />