Laserfiche WebLink
a. The resort has developed an internal process for tracking and reporting on <br /> impervious coverage. This process is detailed in Section 7.12 of the Declarations. <br /> 2. The layout represented in the final plat is what was presented and approved in the <br /> preliminary plat. s ) ;',"V"'-2� <br /> 3. The City Attorney is-ri fViZ g the title information. <br /> 4. The City Attorneyan&CityEngineer-a€e-st&working on tfie t. <br /> 5. An independent land surveyor has concurred that the final document meets the statutory <br /> requirements. <br /> 6. No financial security has been provided. The amount of financial security will be <br /> identified within the development agreement,when prepared. <br /> Planning Commission Direction: Subject to appeal, the Planning Commission is the only <br /> review and approval body for final platting. <br /> The Planning Commission should develop findings to either approve or deny the final plat. In <br /> general, the Commission cannot deny a final plat unless the applicant will not or cannot meet <br /> the final platting requirements or the conditions of the preliminary plat approval. The <br /> Commission cannot impose additional conditions that do not fall directly within the guidelines <br /> of the final plat or relate directly to conditions imposed in the preliminary plat. <br /> The Commission also has the option to table the final plat to obtain additional information. <br /> Staff Recommendation: We recommend that the application be tabled so that the review of <br /> the title information and the development agreement can be completed. <br /> It should be noted that the Park Board has recommended that the applicant submit a park <br /> dedication fee of $17,740.80. This fee was derived using a formula that had been originally <br /> discussed and was recommended by the Board at their February 8,2007,meeting. <br /> City of Pequot Lakes Staff Report 1-2 <br /> April 19,2007 <br />