My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6A - Discussion, Nonconforming Lots
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
10-16-2008 Planning Commission Meeting
>
6A - Discussion, Nonconforming Lots
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2016 3:17:13 PM
Creation date
6/10/2016 3:17:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> COMMUNITYGRoWTH of <br /> N S T i T U T E P "Yott <br /> Experts in Sa►ttall Town Planning ��o�•-...-- <br /> ` STAFF REPORT <br /> Application: Discussion,Non Conforming Lots <br /> Agenda Item: 6(a) <br /> Background Information: We had received a complaint regarding the Elaine May <br /> property on Lower Cullen and an addition to the principle structure. After investigation, <br /> we have concluded that the addition was in the setback,which was not clear from the site <br /> plan. <br /> In reviewing the request and the requirements of the Ordinance for this particular <br /> application, and also in consideration of some of our recent application requests, we felt <br /> it was important to receive some clarification on when and how to apply the provisions <br /> regarding non-conforming lots. <br /> Applicable Regulations: Section 17-4.3 deals with non-conforming lots and states <br /> the following: <br /> 1. A lot, pre-existing for which a Deed, recorded Contract for Deed or other <br /> legal conveyance or plat has been executed prior the effective date of the <br /> Ordinance shall be deemed a buildable lot without requiring a variance provided <br /> it has at least 80% of required lot area and lot width at the ordinary high water <br /> mark and building line, all the setbacks can be maintained, and sanitary <br /> provisions for well and sewage disposal can be maintained. <br /> We have generally held that this means all construction on a property would require a <br /> variance due to the lot being non-conforming. It has been raised to staff that this should <br /> perhaps be interpreted to apply only to the establishment of a principle structure and <br /> that, subsequent to that act, so long as all additional construction was compliant with the <br /> Code,no further variances would be required. <br /> For example, we recently considered a variance for an addition to a non-conforming <br /> cabin. If that addition had met all setbacks or had encroached no further into a setback <br /> and would qualify as a one-time addition,would a variance still be necessary because it is <br /> on a non-conforming lot. The discussion of the Commission seemed to be unclear on <br /> this issue. <br /> A second and related issue has to do with the one-time addition provision. We quote <br /> from a recent letter sent to Elaine May on this issue: <br /> The City of Pequot Lakes allows a one-time addition to an existing non- <br /> conforming structure. Although we did not consider this at the time we issued <br /> your permit(we believed your structure to be conforming), it would appear that <br /> you meet the criteria for a one-time addition, with the possible exception of the <br /> lot itself being non-conforming. The criteria are as follows,from Section 17-4.4, <br /> Subpart 4: <br /> 4. A one-time addition to a non-conforming principle structure shall <br /> be permitted subject to the following: <br /> Pequot Lakes Staff Report 6(a)-1 <br /> October 16,2oo8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.