Laserfiche WebLink
requirements. Net result: big distances, auto dependence, vast road networks, and dull <br /> cookie-cutter places. <br /> So what's the nature of form-based codes, the substitute now being pushed by advocates <br /> of richer mixed-use developments? Peter Katz, founder and former director of the <br /> Congress for the New Urbanism, reeled off the claimed benefits at the Chicago meeting. <br /> The new codes, he says,focus less on what's forbidden and more on what's desired--the <br /> kind of town or city that people indicate they want. Mixed use is welcomed back. Basic <br /> rules are specified--for example a range of acceptable building types from apartments <br /> and townhouses to detached villas or high-rise towers (leaving individual design,for the <br /> most part, to owners). There are regulations, but fairly modest ones: typically the new <br /> codes specify minimum and maximum height, avoiding blank walls, and especially <br /> building out to the sidewalks to create a sense of place. <br /> Underlying the codes, says Katz, each area needs a vision or plan--a community design, <br /> if you will--so that private building decisions more easily harmonize with and add <br /> excellence to the public realm we've so neglected in recent decades, especially our <br /> communities'streetscapes, squares and public buildings. <br /> Let the form-based codes, he suggests, be simple and straighffiorward, backed up by <br /> easily accessible, computer-based graphics, and avoid the legalisms and obscurities <br /> typical of so much zoning. <br /> There are barriers: Only a handful of town planning firms are adept with the new codes-- <br /> nearly all with some connection to the Miami-based firm of Duany Plater-2yberk which <br /> "invented"the technique with its 1982 plan for Seaside, Fla. <br /> And of those firms, even fewer have conducted the "charrettes" of week-long community <br /> meetings to focus on redesign of individual neighborhoods or commercial centers and <br /> gauge public choices from real alternatives. Such meetings (which Seattle planner Mark <br /> Hinshaw would call 'public workshops') establish the vision on which local codes can <br /> than be fashioned. <br /> What's against form-based codes is that they're new and disturbing to many developers, <br /> politicians and homeowners afraid of any change. And they aren't familiar (and thus <br /> reassuring) to big lenders. At worst, University of Pennsylvania land use expert Jonathan <br /> Barnett told the Chicago gathering, introducing form-based codes says to politicos: <br /> "Let's anticipate every land use fight we could have in the next 20 years, and have it <br /> now." <br /> Most likely, the new codes will make their mark first for individual projects and only go <br /> citywide or countywide later. <br /> Pequot Lakes Staff Report 6(a)-5 <br /> December 11,2008 <br />