Laserfiche WebLink
c _ <br /> 19 e0l <br /> VP <br /> September 8, 2007 <br /> City of Pequot Lakes _ <br /> Potential Ordinance Violation <br /> PIN: 291270000050009 <br /> 3945 County Road 168 <br /> To Whom it May Concern, <br /> We were suprised to get the complaint in the mail. The landscaping including the stairs in our back yard was <br /> completed over 2 years ago and seemed to be overwhelmingly well-received by many on Mayo Lake. We used a _ <br /> local, professional landscaper who showed us numerous photos of similar steps he installed on many of the local <br /> lakes. He did not indicate that it would be necessary for us to request a permit. We have contacted him after <br /> receiving this complaint and he assured us of the following: <br /> No soil was removed in the construction of the stairs... they were constructed to rest on top of the soil. The <br /> vegetation around the stairs remains intact and have made them very solid, with little or no chance for erosion. <br /> Again, they were constructed by a professional and were crafted with excellence and care and we were unaware <br /> that stairs could qualify as a new structure and require a Land Use Permit. <br /> The stairs were constructed to create a safer way to reach the lower part of the yard. We have 5 small children <br /> and we were concerned about the steep and irregular grade of the existing cement stairs by the boathouse. They _ <br /> have had many accidents on the cement stairs, and the new wood stairs are very safe for our children. <br /> The sand on the beach was placed on top of the grass with no cubic yards of material removed to make the <br /> beach area. Please refer to the before and after photographs to be assured that we simply added sand on top of _ <br /> the existing lawn. Our landscaper estimated we added about 4 cubic yards of sand for the beach area. <br /> Enclosed are photos supporting our case. We are hopeful that you will support our opinion that while we <br /> enhanced our property with our stairs and landscaping, we are not in violation of the indicated ordinances. If the — <br /> Board feels that we are in violation of the ordinances indicated after reviewing our case, we have included our <br /> application for a Land Use Permit after-the-fact. <br /> Thank you for your time and consideration. — <br /> Siiinc�erre�ly,C` ../J/ <br /> Ncelle Sheehan Kevin Sheehan <br />