My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8 - MInutes 041708
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
05-15-2008 Planning Commission Meeting
>
8 - MInutes 041708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2016 11:32:08 AM
Creation date
6/10/2016 11:32:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 additional units. The wastewater treatment facility is designed forl6,250 gallons per <br /> day. The MPCA will make final permit approvals. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT: <br /> Ann Beaver, 26834 Pine Acres Road,Nisswa, President of the Cullen Lakes Association: <br /> Page 2 of Staff Report, is there a requirement for owners to put units in rental pool and be _ <br /> made available? They are to be in a rental pool, but it does not state a number of days <br /> they have to be available for rent. Page 6, Findings of Fact 36 & 37,please clarify what <br /> area is being referred to. Mr. Marohn stated the Staff Report should be western shore, — <br /> not eastern shore. Mrs. Beaver also stated that Finding of Fact 37.the PUD allowed 34 <br /> mooring sites, but 40 were approved. Mr. Marohn stated that this is fhe exact Finding <br /> from the last CUP. We used commercial density to determine.number of slips at 40. — <br /> Cullen lakes Assoc has no objection to the relocation of tle Iots :along as the density in <br /> the tiers is not increased, or to the lodge facility. For the constructh:of storage area, we <br /> feel it would be a nice thing if you considered a 50' buffer. — <br /> With regard to the suggested conditions of approval, we stro ugly urge you'Oplude <br /> Conditions 10- 12 that has to do with the moorings,as well'ax 15 - 17,things we have -- <br /> felt strongly about since 2005. If they were not included,we would be strongly opposed <br /> to this application. Regarding the beach, or second beach;-the CUP application includes a <br /> phrase to create a second beach. The g .Report states only plans to expand existing <br /> beach. We strongly oppose the second beach:h.r environmental reasons. In 2003 all <br /> parcels on the Cullen Lakes were photographed ftopn the lake;'(Mrs. Beaver presented -� <br /> photos for our records.) In.March, 2005 wt xevorted illegal clearing of vegetation along <br /> that peninsula(Mrs. Beaver presented photo�'for our records) The City disagreed with <br /> our assessment at that time. The:City thought otherwise. In November, 2007, a second <br /> beach had been created-;W,ong t1wt shoreline. (Mt's'Beaver presented photos for our — <br /> records) Mrs. Beaver qit-gtipned hye the City:'-'accepted the CUP application when the <br /> applicant is,in violation for the consffii6 ,6,'Of that second beach. Chairman Woog stated <br /> that the City is aware Of that violation. CLA attended site visit. Applicant altered the — <br /> shorellne without a permit Mrs Beaver stated that the applicant did request the second <br /> beach. The,Staff Report needs to be more clear. The Staff Report could say a second <br /> beach is not approved with this application. May, 2007 DNR conducted vegetation — <br /> survey and part of survey indicated shoal substrates and at that second beach area the lake <br /> bottom is silt and marl, no natural sand. The LCA is very strongly opposed to the second <br /> beach. For restoratip wof beach area, we suggest contacting Beth Hippert at SWCD. — <br /> Mr. Williams asked regarding the photos around lake, what is water level today? Mrs. _ <br /> Beaver stated it may be down a foot,not more. <br /> Paul Reichenbach, 27188 Sarah Lane: The proposed lodge and wellness center-will — <br /> they have a paved parking lot? Mr. Miller stated there would be a paved parking lot. <br /> Will it be visible from lake? Mr. Miller stated it would not be visible from the lake. Mr. <br /> Reichenback stated that he recently looked at the website for Wilderness and they are — <br /> already advertising the storage facility, lodge, 2 beaches, etc. He also asked when the '1 <br /> DNR determines docks for boating, are they going to look at docks for swimming also. <br /> Minutes 2 — <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> April 17, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.