My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8A - Minutes 041708
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
06-19-2008 Planning Commission Meeting
>
8A - Minutes 041708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2016 9:07:31 AM
Creation date
6/10/2016 9:07:29 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 additional units. The wastewater treatment facility is designed forl6,250 gallons per <br /> day. The MPCA will make final permit approvals. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT: <br /> Ann Beaver, 26834 Pine Acres Road,Nisswa, President of the Cullen Lakes Association: <br /> Page 2 of Staff Report, is there a requirement for owners to put units in rental pool and be <br /> made available? They are to be in a rental pool,but it does not state a number of days <br /> they have to be available for rent. Page 6, Findings of Fact 36 & 37,please clarify what <br /> area is being referred to. Mr. Marohn stated the Staff Report should be western shore, <br /> not eastern shore. Mrs. Beaver also stated that Finding of Fact 37 the PUD allowed 34 <br /> mooring sites, but 40 were approved. Mr. Marohn stated that this is the exact Finding <br /> from the last CUP. We used commercial density to determine--number of slips at 40. <br /> Cullen lakes Assoc has no objection to the relocation of the lots' along as the density in <br /> the tiers is not increased, or to the lodge facility. For the'60nstru6 —.9f storage area,we <br /> feel it would be a nice thing if you considered a 50' buffer. <br /> With regard to the suggested conditions of approval, we strongly urge you'W' ode <br /> Conditions 10– 12 that has to do with the moorings, as well as 15 – 17, things we have <br /> felt strongly about since 2005. If they were not included we would be strongly opposed <br /> to this application. Regarding the beach, or second beach,the CUP application includes a <br /> phrase to create a second beach. The Staff Report states only plans to expand existing <br /> beach. We strongly oppose the second be'": <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.