My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
03-17-2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2016 2:10:57 PM
Creation date
6/7/2016 2:10:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dave Arbuckle, Chaska—scuba dives and jet skiers race past flag. A lot of garbage on <br /> lake bottom. With low water, boats are stuck on lake. <br /> Public Comment closed. <br /> Canopies were discussed. They would be over the slip, not an addition. They should be <br /> earth-toned colors, such as dark green. Forty green shore stations may be too many, but <br /> better than white. Twenty-three are allowed from first tier. <br /> Marie Boudrye, 6258 Inland Trails Road—Boats now tear up the lake. Canopies would <br /> increase traffic by inviting larger boats. The lake is too small, only 800' wide. <br /> Dave Arbuckle, Chaska—shore stations could be allowed,but use boat covers instead of <br /> canopies. <br /> Charlie Boudrye—need to define mooring station. Would there be a shore station/lift at <br /> every mooring point? <br /> Screening should be provided between Unit 41 and the adjacent residential property. <br /> A motion was made by Tom Adams, seconded by Bill Habein,to approve the <br /> Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, based on the following findings <br /> of fact, as modified: <br /> On the zoning&setbacks <br /> 1. The underlying zone is Waterfront Commercial. <br /> 2. The Waterfront Commercial district allows commercial PUD's with a conditional <br /> use permit. <br /> 3. The Commercial PUD is subject to all of the setback requirements of the <br /> underlying zone, in this case Waterfront Commercial. <br /> 4. All of the units are outside of the 75 foot shoreline setback. <br /> 5. All units meet the 30 foot bluff setback. <br /> 6. There is no defined minimum parcel size for Waterfront Commercial in the <br /> Ordinance. <br /> On the conditional use permit <br /> 1. There is no reason to believe that expansion on the Wilderness Resort,with <br /> vigorous conditions,would harm the health, safety,or welfare of the community. <br /> 2. Access to the resort is off of public right-of-way. <br /> 3. The PUD would continue to act as a resort. Although there will be some <br /> intensification of use,there will be no change in land use. The use will remaining <br /> compatible with the adjacent properties. <br /> 4. A Commercial PUD is a permitted conditional use within the Waterfront <br /> Commercial District. <br /> 5. The Comprehensive Plan specifically identifies Wilderness Resort as a <br /> recreational amenity of the City(page 64). One of the goals of the <br /> Comprehensive Plan is to "Maintain private resorts and facilities for public <br /> Planning Commission 3 <br /> March 17, 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.