My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
08-18-2005 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2016 2:10:50 PM
Creation date
6/7/2016 2:10:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilman Greer was in the audience and stated that we have a developer willing to <br /> extend utilities, it increases tax base and Pequot needs to grow. <br /> A motion was made by John Derksen, seconded by Tom Adams, to recommend Parcel <br /> 290104100BB0009 be rezoned to Urban Residential, based on the following Findings of <br /> Fact: <br /> 1. The parcel is within walking distance. <br /> 2. The parcel abuts the Downtown Mixed Use zone. <br /> 3. Public water and sewer on southern boundary. <br /> 4. Present ownership remains unchanged. <br /> 5. No conflicts between land uses. <br /> All members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> A motion was made by Dean Williams, seconded by John Derksen,to recommend Parcel <br /> 290104100BA0009 be rezoned to Transition Residential, based on the following <br /> Findings of Fact: <br /> 1. 1. The rezoning to Transition Residential is consistent with the City's <br /> Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map. <br /> 2. The properties to the west, a property to the south, and a property to the east all <br /> have been rezoned to Transition Residential. Several properties to the east that <br /> have been proposed to be rezoned to Transition Residential, as well, but have <br /> chosen to have a later separate public hearing. The subject property is partly <br /> adjacent to a property to the north that has been rezoned to Agriculture. <br /> 3. Rezoning the property to Transition Residential would not constitute spot zoning. <br /> Rezoning to Urban Residential also would not constitute spot zoning. <br /> 4. The Transition Residential zone is compatible with the surrounding zones and <br /> serves as a buffer between the more intense Downtown Mixed Use zone to the <br /> south and the Agriculture zone to the north. <br /> 5. Rezoning to Urban Residential would not be compatible with the Agriculture <br /> zone to the north. <br /> 6. The areas of the two properties meet the minimum buildable area of five (5) acres <br /> for the Transition Residential zone, being 9 and 16.5 acres. These properties also <br /> meet the minimum lot area and dimension requirements for the Urban Residential <br /> zone. <br /> 7. This property is not currently served by City sewer and water services, but <br /> utilities could be extended to this property from the end point at County Road 112 <br /> and Grove Street. <br /> Mr. Qualley stated that the Ordinance does not say Urban Residential cannot abut <br /> Agriculture zone. Mr. Marohn stated that it was the intent that Urban Residential <br /> would not abut the Agriculture zone. <br /> Roll Call Vote: Mr. Habein: Aye; Mr. Williams: Aye; Mr. Adams: Nay; Mr. Hallan: <br /> Aye; Mr. Pederson: Nay; Mr. Derksen: Aye. Motion carried. 4—2. <br /> Planning Commission 6 <br /> August 18, 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.