My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-20-2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
04-20-2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2016 1:51:32 PM
Creation date
6/7/2016 1:51:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
When asked if he could pick up an acre from a neighbor, Mr. Goerges stated he could <br /> �.. not. A Conditional Use Permit would be required for a church. Mr. Marohn explained <br /> that the number of allowable animal units decreases with subdivision. <br /> To clarify, Mr. Marohn stated that under the Forest Management classification, one 10 <br /> acre parcel could be subdivided tomorrow. <br /> A motion was made by Dean Williams, seconded by Tom Adams, to recommend <br /> rezoning the parcel to Forest Management, based on the following findings of fact: <br /> 1. The rezoning to Forest Management is consistent with the City's Comprehensive <br /> Plan. The property is designated as Forest Management because it is a large, <br /> undeveloped tract of land, it is not served by municipal utilities and <br /> approximately 50% of the property is wooded. <br /> 2. The subject property is adjacent to properties that have been rezoned to Rural <br /> Residential to the north, Agriculture to the west,Recreation to the northwest, and <br /> Forest Management to the south. <br /> 3. The property to the east has not yet been rezoned, but the City has proposed to <br /> rezone this property to Agriculture. The property to the southeast has not yet <br /> been rezoned, but is proposed to be rezoned to Forest Management. The larger <br /> properties to the north are proposed to be rezoned to Transition Residential, but <br /> have not yet been rezoned. <br /> 4. The Forest Management Zone is compatible with the Agriculture, Rural <br /> Residential, Transition Residential, Commercial and Light Industrial zones. <br /> 5. The property was zoned Forestry under the previous Ordinance, which required a <br /> minimum lot size of 10 acres. The Forest Management zone as a minimum lot <br /> size of 10 acres, while the Rural Residential zone has a minimum lot size of 5 <br /> acres. <br /> 6. The property meets the minimum lot size for both the Rural Residential and <br /> Forest Management zones, being roughly 40 acres in size. <br /> 7. The property meets the minimum lot width for both the Rural Residential and <br /> Forest Management zones, being over 1,300 feet wide. <br /> All members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> APPLICANT: City of Pequot Lakes. Josef and Agnes Goerges, property owners. Parcel <br /> ID's are: 290132200000009, 290131300000009,290132300000009, and <br /> 290132400000009. <br /> Mr. and Mrs. Goerges were in attendance. Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report, <br /> recommending all 4 parcels be rezoned to Forest Management. Mr. Goerges stated he <br /> would like the zoning to remain Forestry. There is no farmland as it is all rocky. <br /> A motion was made by Tom Adams, seconded by Scott Pederson,to recommend <br /> rezoning all four parcels to Forest Management, based on the following findings of fact: <br /> Planning Commission 2 <br /> April 20, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.