Laserfiche WebLink
Mark Jurchen, 31387 Lakeside Avenue stated that we need homes that people can afford. <br /> �., We need to increase our tax base. The City has 5 to 7 million dollars in costs related to <br /> the expansion of TH 371. We don't want to get caught up in bureaucracy. Developers <br /> will not want to come to Pequot Lakes or we will have a tax base too high to encourage <br /> new businesses. <br /> The Planning Commission discussed whether the zoning was correct, could they make a <br /> decision on this plat and would they be creating a precedent by transferring density? Mr. <br /> Marohn explained that transferring density is used often. They would not be setting a <br /> precedent by transferring density. The Planning Commission stated the remainder of the <br /> Hemmerich property,having water, wastewater and a public road, would become <br /> immensely more valuable. The 40-foot ROW in a Rural Section will not work. <br /> A straw vote was taken whether or not the parcel is properly zoned. Yes—4. No—3. <br /> The Planning Commission discussed the 40%green space and whether they should stay <br /> at 40%or decrease the requirement. Mr. Smith is close at 31.5%. Maybe another design <br /> could make it contiguous. Mr. Varilek and Mr. Habein were in favor of dropping from <br /> 40%. The property to the south could be developed with a house every 50 feet. The <br /> Ordinance would need to be amended to reduce the 40%requirement. The Trail cannot <br /> be counted. Forty percent is a sound number and Mr. Smith is the first applicant to ask to <br /> have it changed. Seeing a plat gave real world example of what 40%does to actual <br /> property. Rural Conservation Designs use 40%. It is not State statute. Forty percent is a <br /> design guideline and has worked in other places. Nisswa uses 50%. Staff was directed to <br /> research other local cities to see what they use. <br /> A design committee was established to meet prior to the next meeting to discuss this plat. <br /> This committee is to include: Mr. Smith, Paul Smith, Mr. Hemmerich, Mr. Trottier, Mr. <br /> Woog, Mr. Marohn, Mr. Williams, and Mr. Hallan. Perhaps Mr. Pederson if Mr. <br /> Williams cannot attend. <br /> A motion was made by Mark Hallan, seconded by John Derksen,to table this application. <br /> All members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> APPLICANT: Allen Berens. <br /> Applicant requests Final Plat of Keen Addition. <br /> Mr. Marohn explained that additional information was needed and advised that the <br /> Planning Commission either table or deny the request. <br /> Mr. Berens was present. He stated that he did not know the road would have to be tarred <br /> when he began this project. He planned to put class 5 down and monies for the Park <br /> Dedication Fee. He doesn't have the abstract for the property. He provided City <br /> Attorney Sandelin with a Title Insurance Policy. He will meet with Mr. Sandelin on the <br /> Planning Commission 2 <br /> March 16, 2006 <br />