My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
02-16-2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2016 1:51:30 PM
Creation date
6/7/2016 1:51:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OPEN FORUM: None. Chairman Hallan stated he would bring this back at the end of <br /> the meeting. <br /> NEW BUSNESS: <br /> WAREHOUSING AND COMMERCIAL WAREHOUSING DEFINITIONS: <br /> Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. The Crafters Mall would be allowed as a CUP, <br /> but the winter storage of boats would not if defined as Commercial Warehousing. A <br /> condition could be added to the CUP for the Crafters Mall for the winter storage. Interior <br /> storage only, no "stuff' left outside. <br /> EXTRACTIVE USE OVERLAY DISTRICT: <br /> Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. Some additional criteria to consider: current pit <br /> locations, outside shoreland areas, access to major roadway,vicinity to residential areas, <br /> visibility from road, buffer distance,types of processing, continue in FM and AG, and <br /> areas where gravel is present. <br /> Terry Curtis,Anderson Brothers Construction, was in the audience. He stated that other <br /> criteria would be location and resource needs. The County has tier requirements and <br /> there is mapping available indicating where gravel is present. <br /> Reclamation needs to be addressed. Inactive pits are an eyesore. Extractive and <br /> processing plants are separate issues. Reclamation needs to be phased or have a <br /> timeframe. <br /> Staff was directed to obtain approval from City Council to move forward. Above <br /> information and/or tools could be costly. <br /> INDUSTRIAL/BUSINESS PARK USES. <br /> Staff explained that the information handout listed permitted uses from our old ordinance. <br /> When they updated the handout with the new ordinance information, the"list" seemed <br /> generic. Staff was directed to work with City Planner to revise handout. <br /> JANN BLESENER— Sketch Plan Review: <br /> Cindy from Landecker and Assoc. was present to collect information for applicant. She <br /> stated they plan to increase the size of 2 cabins, convert garages into bunkhouses and <br /> construct extra units in the back for family. <br /> They plan to create 2 new lots by moving the center lot line. The lots are non- <br /> conforming now. The one cabin is 37.8 feet from the OHW. There are rules for <br /> increasing non-conforming structures. A PUD can be done without this density. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 4 <br /> February 16, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.