Laserfiche WebLink
fencing or other means as approved by the City. Trails should not be <br /> constructed over the treatment areas. <br /> d. The City may wish to require a copy of the sewage pumping contract <br /> between the association and their pumper/maintenance contractor, and <br /> maintenance records on an annual or bi-annual basis. <br /> e. All piping/collection systems must meet the requirements of the <br /> Minnesota Plumbing Code, and include cleanouts at the required intervals, <br /> minimum slope, size of pipe, pipe materials, etc. <br /> The applicant has modified the sewage treatment system plans to provide for the <br /> Phase 2 treatment field to be relocated 20-feet from Lot 10 and 10 feet from the <br /> top of the bluff. <br /> 5. The applicant has not complied with all conditions and requirements of <br /> preliminary approval. Outstanding concerns from the City Attorney remain. <br /> 6. The Final Plat has been prepared in agreement with the preliminary plat. <br /> 7. The title work has been provided and is being reviewed by the City Attorney. <br /> 8. There are no required improvements and therefore no financial security is <br /> necessary. <br /> 9. An independent land surveyor has concurred that the final document meets the <br /> statutory requirements. <br /> subject to the following conditions: <br /> 1. Homeowner's association documents satisfactory to the City Attorney. <br /> 2. Copies of all exhibits are attached to the Declarations. <br /> 3. The applicant shall concur to have Lot 16,the common space lot, rezoned to Open <br /> Space consistent with the use and intention of the lot prior to the recording of the <br /> document. <br /> All members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> Park Dedication was brought up. Mr. Marohn checked the Ordinance and stated that the <br /> Park Board makes a recommendation to the Planning Commission. The Planning <br /> Commission acts on Final Plats,meaning Park Dedication. <br /> Mr. Pederson was prepared to dispute the recommendation of the Park Board for a Park <br /> Dedication Fee of$55,900.00. He asked if the City had a capital improvement budget on <br /> parks and open space. Without one, there are no legal grounds to make a Park Dedication <br /> Fee. Staff stated that she was not qualified to answer this question. She would need to <br /> check with the City Clerk. Mr. Marohn stated that there is a trail plan included in the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. Demand for parks is driven by growth and development,thus the <br /> purpose of a Park Dedication Fee. <br /> Mr. Pederson passed out a handout. Previous plats with Park Dedication Fees were <br /> discussed. Staff was directed to re-evaluate the Park Dedication for Trailside Estates and <br /> bring back to the Planning Commission in February. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 3 <br /> January 18, 2007 <br />