My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-2008 Planning Commission Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2008
>
04-17-2008 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2016 11:56:38 AM
Creation date
6/7/2016 11:56:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 additional units. The wastewater treatment facility is designed for16,250 gallons per <br /> `. day. The MPCA will make final permit approvals. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT: <br /> Ann Beaver,26834 Pine Acres Road,Nisswa, President of the Cullen Lakes Association: <br /> Page 2 of Staff Report, is there a requirement for owners to put units in rental pool and be <br /> made available? They are to be in a rental pool,but it does not state a number of days <br /> they have to be available for rent. Page 6, Findings of Fact 36 & 37,please clarify what <br /> area is being referred to. Mr. Marohn stated the Staff Report should be western shore, <br /> not eastern shore. Mrs. Beaver also stated that Finding of Fact 37 the PUD allowed 34 <br /> mooring sites, but 40 were approved. Mr. Marohn stated that this is the exact Finding <br /> from the last CUP. We used commercial density to determine number of slips at 40. <br /> Cullen lakes Assoc has no objection to the relocation of the lots so along as the density in <br /> the tiers is not increased, or to the lodge facility. For the construction of storage area, we <br /> feel it would be a nice thing if you considered a 50' buffer. <br /> With regard to the suggested conditions of approval, we strongly urge you include <br /> Conditions 10— 12 that has to do with the moorings, as well as 15— 17,things we have <br /> felt strongly about since 2005. If they were not included we would be strongly opposed <br /> to this application. Regarding the beach, or second beach,the CUP application includes a <br /> phrase to create a second beach. The Staff Report states only plans to expand existing <br /> beach. We strongly oppose the second beach for environmental reasons. In 2003 all <br /> parcels on the Cullen Lakes were photographed from the lake. (Mrs. Beaver presented <br /> photos for our records.) In March, 2005 we reported illegal clearing of vegetation along <br /> that peninsula(Mrs. Beaver presented photos for our records) The City disagreed with <br /> our assessment at that time. The City thought otherwise. In November, 2007, a second <br /> beach had been created along that shoreline. (Mrs. Beaver presented photos for our <br /> records) Mrs. Beaver questioned why the City accepted the CUP application when the <br /> applicant is in violation for the construction of that second beach. Chairman Woog stated <br /> that the City is aware of that violation. CLA attended site visit. Applicant altered the <br /> shoreline without a permit. Mrs. Beaver stated that the applicant did request the second <br /> beach. The Staff Report needs to be more clear. The Staff Report could say a second <br /> beach is not approved with this application. May, 2007 DNR conducted vegetation <br /> survey and part of survey indicated shoal substrates and at that second beach area the lake <br /> bottom is silt and marl,no natural sand. The LCA is very strongly opposed to the second <br /> beach. For restoration of beach area, we suggest contacting Beth Hippert at SWCD. <br /> Mr. Williams asked regarding the photos around lake, what is water level today? Mrs. <br /> Beaver stated it may be down a foot,not more. <br /> Paul Reichenbach, 27188 Sarah Lane: The proposed lodge and wellness center—will <br /> they have a paved parking lot? Mr. Miller stated there would be a paved parking lot. <br /> Will it be visible from lake? Mr. Miller stated it would not be visible from the lake. Mr. <br /> Reichenback stated that he recently looked at the website for Wilderness and they are <br /> already advertising the storage facility, lodge, 2 beaches, etc. He also asked when the <br /> DNR determines docks for boating, are they going to look at docks for swimming also. <br /> Minutes 2 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> April 17, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.