Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Adams stated that the Breezy Point issue had nothing to do with bringing this back <br /> for discussion. There are new issued that were not on the table two or three years ago <br /> and thought this should be looked at periodically. These were discussed and are thought <br /> provoking. <br /> Tom: Breezy issue has nothing to do with it. New issues on table that were not ont the <br /> table 2 or 3 years ago and thought we should look at it periodically. Coulple of reasons <br /> to do it that are thought provoking. <br /> Mr. Williams stated that unless you live in a floodplain, you don't need FEMA insurance. <br /> FEMA is federal money spent to help a community rebuild. <br /> Mr. Woog stated he asked for this to be on the Agenda as it should be revisited. <br /> Mr. Hallan stated that a lot of people may be financially impacted when things are done <br /> wrong. <br /> Mrs. Peterson stated we need to look in it more. Some builders are skimping to get by. <br /> Mr. Derksen acknowledged that there are problems,but doesn't think this is the answer <br /> yet. <br /> Mr. Mealhouse stated he is willing to help should we have additional questions. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: Mr. Habein,Aye; Mr. Adams,Nay; Mrs. Peterson,Nay; Mr. <br /> Derksen,Aye; Mr. Williams,Aye; Mr. Hallan,Nay; Mr. Woog,Nay. <br /> Motion Fails: 3 Ayes, 4 Nays. <br /> OLD BUSINESS: <br /> TH 371 Alternate Alignment Zoning— <br /> Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report which listed 14 scenarios to examine the <br /> cost/benefit ratio for zoning this area. Two things the City needs to examine is how to <br /> make this healthy and prosperous. The notion is that we need to keep taxes low to attract <br /> businesses, as well as making a smooth regulatory environment that protects peoples <br /> investments. Having water and sewer extended to the alternate alignment is tonight's <br /> discussion. Jon Commers from Donjek stated that from an engineering standpoint, it <br /> would be better for the City to do nothing,where the cost was less for the City,there is a <br /> greater benefit. <br /> Grow Zone Discussion— <br /> Minutes 3 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> April 16, 2009 <br />