06-17-2010 Planning Commission Minutes

Home Browse Search

nuisance and to control lights and signs in such a manner,that no disturbance to `-- neighboring properties will result. 2. The conditional use should not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purpose permitted on that property, nor substantially diminish or impair values in the immediate vicinity. Discussion: Mr. Adams stated he was not in favor of the motion. By limiting the number of dogs outside and requiring a solid fence, along with the City's noise ordinance, we could approve this. The property is at least 2/3 substantially screened by trees. This is a reasonable request. Mr. Woog stated he struggles because it is allowed in Ag, Forest Management and Rural Residential. It is allowed with a Conditional Use Permit and conditions can be applied if needed. He disagrees with the motion as well. Mr. Woog called for the vote: 3 Aye, 1 Nay (Adams). Motion carries. Application denied. APPLICANT: City of Pequot Lakes Applicant requests an Ordinance Amendment to clarify the Metes and Bounds Subdivision Process Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. There was no public comment. A motion was made by Scott Pederson, seconded by John Derksen, to approve the following Ordinance Amendment to clarify the Metes and Bounds Subdivision Process. Section 17-3.2. DEFINITIONS 72. Conventional Subdivision. A residential development that eent ins mere than*wa lets not done by Conservation Design Section 17-5.7 TRANSITION RESIDENTIAL (TR) 3. Lot,Use and Density Requirements. Lot Width- feet, minimum......................................................................200 Buildable Lot Area, Metes and Bounds Subdivision-acres, minimum....10 Buildable Lot Area, non-Metes and Bounds -acres, minimum............l MINUTES 7 Pequot Lakes Planning Commission June 17, 2010