My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-21-2010 Planning Commission Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
01-21-2010 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2016 11:28:11 AM
Creation date
6/7/2016 11:28:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. The property is properly zoned Rural Residential, Open Space, Shoreline <br /> �- Residential and Transition Residential. Tract A is currently used for residential <br /> purposes while Tract B is vacant and does not have a use established. <br /> 2. Tract A would meet the minimum requirements for the Rural Residential district <br /> when it is combined with the parcel abutting it to the north. Tract B would meet <br /> the minimum requirements for the Transition Residential, Open Space, and <br /> Shoreline Residential districts. <br /> 3. Both Tracts A and B have more than 20,000 square feet of buildable area. Neither <br /> Tract A nor Tract B would be constrained from future development. <br /> 4. There are not any nonconforming structures located on Tract A or Tract B. <br /> 5. The survey does not indicate the impervious surface coverage for Tract A but it is <br /> evident that it is less than 15 percent. Tract B does not contain any impervious <br /> surface coverage. <br /> 6. The property is suitable in its natural state for the intended purpose and this lot <br /> split would not be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of future residents or of <br /> the community. <br /> 7. It is assumed that Tract A contains a SSTS as it contains two existing buildings. <br /> Tract B does not contain a SSTS and staff is attempting to verify whether soils <br /> information is available from the local SWCD and whether that is sufficient to <br /> verify the suitability of the site for two sewer sites. <br /> 8. The applicant is not proposing any provisions for water-based recreation. <br /> 9. Both tracts will conform to the minimum requirements of all four zoning districts <br /> they encompass. <br /> 10. The proposed lots are unique in that they are currently split due to Highway 371 <br /> and County Road 17. The existing lot lines are compatible with the layout of <br /> existing properties in this area and will not constrain future development of <br /> adjoining properties. <br /> 11. The existing lot lines are jagged and not at right angles to existing road lines but <br /> follow the existing pattern of the right-of-way in this unique area. <br /> 12. Both Tract A and Tract B meet the minimum frontage on public right-of-way <br /> requirement of 33 feet. <br /> Subject to the following condition: <br /> 1. Upon approval, the portion of the property that is zoned Rural Residential (Tract <br /> A) shall be submitted to Crow Wing County for a lot consolidation with Parcel <br /> 290101200CA0009. <br /> OLD BUSINESS: <br /> a. Comprehensive Plan Discussion— <br /> There was no update on the sections previously discussed. <br /> APPROVAL OF MINUTES: <br /> A motion was made by Mark Hallan, seconded by John Derksen,to approve the <br /> December Minutes, as corrected. All members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> Minutes 4 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> January 21, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.