Laserfiche WebLink
COMMUNITYGROWTH Gry of <br /> I N S T I T U T E Nquo <br /> Experts ru Sinalf Town Planning L�Kes- <br /> • Gross Acreage.The total area of a parcel. <br /> Section 17-5.15, LAND USE MATRIX. <br /> Shoreline Conservation Subdivision would be listed as an Allowable Use in the SR <br /> and SC and as an excluded use in all other zones. <br /> Conventional Subdivision would be listed as a Conditional Use in the SR <br /> Planned Unit Development, Commercial and Planned Unit Development, <br /> Residential would be removed from the matrix. <br /> Section 17-8.2 CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT <br /> DEVELOPMENTS. <br /> i. General. <br /> A. Conservation Subdivision and Planned Unit Development(P.U.D.) <br /> requires the assistance of professional planning and usually <br /> involves the approval of multiple agencies or other governmental <br /> bodies. Where circumstances are favorable, Conservation <br /> Subdivision and P.U.D.'s provide more latitude in land use than <br /> normal development to allow for planning, clustering facilities, <br /> �... consolidating green spaces and internal recreation amenities. <br /> While densities higher than normal are often allowed, they must <br /> be justified by the preservation and consolidation of green space, <br /> increased screening and landscaping, increased recreational <br /> amenities and other significant improvements and design features <br /> beneficial to the residents,neighbors and the general public. <br /> B. Mixed use P.U.D. where appropriate, may be allowed provided the <br /> use not normally allowed in the zoning district does not exceed <br /> 35%of the building floor area. <br /> C. Provisions of each zoning district shall govern within that district <br /> except where specifically addressed in this section. <br /> 2. Suitabili . The City must consider the following criteria in the <br /> examination of a parcel for suitability as a PUD: <br /> A. Existing recreational use of the surface waters and likely increases <br /> in use associated with planned unit developments; <br /> B. Physical and aesthetic impacts of increased density; <br /> C. Suitability of lands for the planned unit development approach; <br /> D. Level of current development in the area; and <br /> Pequot Lakes Staff Report 4(b)-2 <br /> January 15,2009 <br />