My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-19-2011 Planning Commission Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
05-19-2011 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2016 10:19:12 AM
Creation date
5/18/2016 10:19:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Member Ryan had the following comments: <br /> - • Our community does not support entrepreneurship. <br /> • We have barrier after barrier for them to move forward. <br /> • We are the third highest tax city in Crow Wing County; <br /> • This community wants a bedroom, quiet,retirement based community. <br /> • The bypass vote sent a strong signal that this community does not want the traffic <br /> in town that would be its life blood. <br /> • We are not extending services out there. You are going around town but you are <br /> not extending any water and sewer out there. <br /> • The more commerce we've got going the better we'll be. <br /> • This (Plan) is a destination, a retail destination,tourist plan generally, with a <br /> couple of other lip service for other stuff around. That's what your gut is telling <br /> you. And I have the same sense for it but from my perspective it's well, if that's <br /> what the community wants,to be a bedroom community, we're gonna get it. And <br /> everything's in place from very restrictive land use ordinances to lack of desire to <br /> extend city services out to any place that we can actually do it. <br /> • We're schizophrenic half the time in Pequot. We aren't consistent in our <br /> message. <br /> • When the road was coming through town we had visibility and this retail <br /> community was viable. There was excitement. Now, that's not the case. <br /> • We could implement a plan that contemplates the next 20 years growth. I always <br /> have believed commerce follows traffic. There is gonna be traffic out there. I <br /> could have been for a bypass that said this is where the growth needs to be. <br /> • Everything is just so painful sometimes to do things that seem like common sense <br /> to me. <br /> • I'd say go to Jenkins where it's easy. Go to Cass County. It is not an easy place <br /> here. <br /> A motion was made by Bill Habein, seconded by Mark Hallan,to end the discussion. <br /> All members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> VOTE ON MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE COMP PLAN AND <br /> SEND IT TO THE CITY COUNCIL: 6 Aye; 1 Nay (Derksen) Motion carried. <br /> ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA: None. <br /> OPEN FORUM: None. <br /> NEW BUSINESS: <br /> A. John Derksen suggested with the Government Drive Improvement Project <br /> perhaps now was a good time to change the name since there are no government <br /> buildings along the street. Chairman Pederson suggested this could be included in the <br /> Improvement discussions. <br /> MINUTES 4 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> May 19, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.