My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-15-2012 Planning Commission Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2012
>
03-15-2012 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2016 10:08:40 AM
Creation date
5/18/2016 10:08:40 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARINGS: <br /> �. APPLICANT: Pamela Benson and Wayne Fjerstad <br /> Applicant requests a Variance to Encroach SSTS within Sideyard Setback <br /> Mr. Burslie explained the Staff Report. Applicants were not present. The SSTS needs to <br /> be 10 feet from the structure; if they move the SSTS over 5 feet closer, it still leaves 15 <br /> feet. Staff recommends not approving this request. <br /> Mr. Habein explained that he and Mr. Adams visited the property earlier in the day. He <br /> stated there appears to be a bluff and the crest of the bluff is very close to the front of the <br /> house. The setback from the bluff is 30 feet. He requested a survey with topo elevations <br /> to determine where the bluff is located. He presented photographs of the lot. There were <br /> a number of iron posts they assumed was the lot line. If the drainfield were placed close <br /> to those posts it would be on a slope. There are also huge trees that would need to be <br /> removed. He stated he cannot make a decision without detailed drawings, a survey and <br /> elevations. <br /> Vice-Chair Adams recommends denying the variance request and have the applicant <br /> submit the needed information. Mr. Habein stated there is very little room left if there is <br /> a bluff. Mr. Levenske stated that the applicant needs to provide a certificate of survey <br /> with topos. <br /> A motion was made by J. J. Levenske, seconded by Bill Habein, to deny the variance. <br /> All members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> Staff was directed to carefully explain to the applicant that we don't have the data <br /> necessary to make a decision in applicant's favor. They will also need to identify the <br /> existing structures. <br /> APPLICANT: Todd Tolifson,Rose City Sign <br /> Applicant requests an Ordinance Amendment to Allow Static Gas Price Display <br /> Vice-Chairman Adams explained the City Council directive. Mr. Burslie explained the <br /> Staff Report. This amendment is only for static gas price signs, not other flashing, <br /> revolving LED signs. A second sentence was added to the amendment with the <br /> suggestion from last month. <br /> Applicant was present and passed out an example of the sign that would replace the <br /> existing panels. Theresa, Super America employee, explained how the prices are now <br /> changed; it is dangerous, icy and the letters and numbers fall. It would be advantageous <br /> to change the sign by pushing a button inside. <br /> Mr. Holland explained the shoe store is a shopping experience that is planned. Super <br /> America gets the transient people passing through town. <br /> MINUTES 2 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> March 15, 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.