My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-2012 Planning Commission Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2012
>
02-16-2012 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2016 10:08:40 AM
Creation date
5/18/2016 10:08:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Holland stated only the price would be LED. He currently has two lines of prices, <br /> IN-1 unleaded and diesel. <br /> The Planning Commission clarified the LED sign would be allowed for both sides of the <br /> sign. <br /> BP only has one gas price sign, per side. <br /> Vote on the amendment to the motion to allow 5 digital numbers: 5 Aye; 1 Nay. Motion <br /> carries. <br /> Tom Adams amended the motion, seconded by Bill Habein,to permit LED gas price <br /> signs if the size and height are brought into conformance with current ordinance. <br /> Mr. Habein stated we should have a new Sign Ordinance before we use this amendment <br /> being proposed? What is conforming today may not be conforming after we look at the <br /> Sign Ordinance. <br /> Vice-Chair Adams stated that continuing a nonconformity is not following the <br /> discussions we have had. We shouldn't let a nonconformity continue with a new sign. <br /> Council Member Akerson stated that signs are expensive. Mr. Holland stated he is at a <br /> competitive disadvantage. <br /> Mr. Levenske stated through his profession representing customers, signs are expensive. <br /> If Mr. Holland can wait, it would be better to wait. <br /> Mr. Holland agrees that it is not a good idea to pass something that isn't right, although it <br /> would be expensive for a new sign. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE on amendment: (Tom Adams amended the motion, seconded by <br /> Bill Habein, to permit LED gas price signs if the size and height are brought into <br /> conformance with current ordinance.) Deb Brown: Aye; Bill Habein: Aye; J. J. <br /> Levenske: Nay; Cheri Seils: Nay; Scott Snyder: Nay; Tom Adams: Aye. Motion Fails: 3 <br /> —3. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE on original motion, as amended: (A motion was made by Scott <br /> Snyder, seconded by Cheri Seils, to allow static LED displays to advertise one gas price, <br /> up to 5 numerals.) Deb Brown: Nay; Bill Habein: Aye; J. J. Levenske:Nay; Cheri Seils: <br /> Aye; Scott Snyder: Aye; Tom Adams: Nay. Motion Fails: 3 —3. <br /> Mr. Marohn recommended the Planning Commission not approve changing the <br /> Ordinance until the Planning Commission has had the opportunity to review the-Sign <br /> Ordinance to make a recommendation to the City Council. <br /> MINUTES 4 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> February 16, 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.