My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4A - Variance to Construct Basement under Existing Dwelling on Non-Conforming Lot (continuation)
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2009
>
10-15-2009 Planning Commission Meeting
>
4A - Variance to Construct Basement under Existing Dwelling on Non-Conforming Lot (continuation)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2016 3:57:41 PM
Creation date
5/16/2016 3:57:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OMMUNITYGRoWTH city of <br /> I N S T I T U T E <br /> T'equot <br /> ,rI-rts in Srnuidl Town Planning Ces <br /> Applicable Regulations: The following regulations are applicable: <br /> Section 17-5.8 Applicable Shoreline Residential Lot Size&Dimension Requirements: <br /> 3. Lot, Use and Density Requirements. <br /> GD Rii2arian 0 nl <br /> Lot width at OHW and building line-feet,minimum 100 <br /> Buildable lot area-square feet,minimum 20,000 <br /> Setback side—feet minimum 10 <br /> Im ervious coverage— maximum 20% <br /> Section 17-11.7 contains provisions regarding the review of variance applications and <br /> directs the Planning Commission to make a decision on a variance request with <br /> consideration for the following factors: <br /> 1. The strict interpretation of the Ordinance would create undue hardship, and <br /> 2. The strict interpretation of the Ordinance would be impractical because of <br /> circumstances relating to lot size, shape, topographic, or other characteristics of <br /> the property not created by the land owner, and <br /> 3. The deviation from the Ordinance with any attached conditions will still be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Ordinance, and <br /> 4. The variance will not create a land use not permitted in the zone,and <br /> 5. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality,and <br /> 6. The variance is not for economic reasons alone, but reasonable use of the <br /> property does not exist under the Ordinance. <br /> Staff Findings: Staff provides the following findings of fact for consideration by the <br /> Board of Adjustment: <br /> For a Variance to Enlarge a Non-Conforming Structure <br /> i. The Ordinance would allow repair to the existing foundation, but not expansion. <br /> However, the expansion of a basement and walkout as proposed is <br /> inconsequential. The footprint is not expanded and the intensity of the overall <br /> structure is not increased. Deny this proposed use would create an undue <br /> hardship. <br /> 2. The strict interpretation of the Ordinance would be impractical because the <br /> expansion is inconsequential and incidental to the repair of the foundation. <br /> 3. A deviation, with conditions would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br /> Ordinance as the foundation on the existing dwelling is in need of repair and the <br /> proposed basement is an inconsequential and incremental addition to the repair <br /> project. <br /> 4. The proposed residential use is permitted in the Shoreline Residential zone. <br /> 5. The variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Adjacent <br /> properties have homes that have basements and small, non-conforming lots. <br /> 6. Reasonable use of the property currently exists as residential use is already <br /> established, but the repair and expansion project, as proposed, is a minor and <br /> reasonable approach. <br /> Pequot Lakes Staff Report 4(a)-2 <br /> October 15,2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.