Laserfiche WebLink
COMMUNITYGR.OWTH City Of <br /> I N S T I T U T E PeQuot <br /> 4. The existing commercial structures on the properties are to be removed. The <br /> �., existing residential structure is proposed to remain on the property. There will be <br /> no non-conformities created by the subdivision. <br /> 5. Municipal water runs through the property and will serve the new development. <br /> Municipal sanitary sewer service is to be extended to the property. <br /> 6. The property is suitable in its natural state for the intended purpose and this lot <br /> split would not be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of future residents or <br /> of the community. <br /> 7. The property currently contains an on-site sewage treatment system that serves <br /> the motel. This system will be abandoned. <br /> 8. The applicant is not proposing any provisions for water-based recreation. <br /> 9. Future development will be constrained by the proposed lot layouts. The <br /> proposed road extension south to Pillsbury Street will constrain the future <br /> development of properties along Highway 371. <br /> 10. The proposed lot lines contain unwarranted bends and jogs that do not <br /> correspond to any topographic condition. The configuration of these jogs <br /> negatively impact the properties that abut both the proposed parcel and Highway <br /> 371• <br /> 11. The property contains more than the 33-feet of minimum frontage on public <br /> right-of-way. <br /> Planning Commission Direction: The Planning Commission may approve the metes <br /> and bounds subdivision, develop findings to deny the metes and bounds subdivision, or <br /> table the subdivision request to gather additional information on which to base a <br /> decision or to provide the applicant time to modify the proposal. <br /> Staff Recommendation: We recommend that the application for a metes and bounds <br /> subdivision be denied. The proposed configuration has no topographic basis and <br /> unnecessarily constrains the future development of neighboring properties. The <br /> proposed configuration is a tortured attempt to meet the impervious coverage standard <br /> which, in technically doing so, sacrifices the green space, spacing and stormwater <br /> benefits of the remaining pervious area. <br /> While we can make this recommendation based on what has been submitted, no survey <br /> document that could be considered for approval has yet been submitted. <br /> Pequot Lakes Staff Report 7(a)-3 <br /> November 5,2009 <br />