My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Memorandum
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2009
>
11-05-2009 Planning Commission Special Meeting
>
Memorandum
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2016 3:42:34 PM
Creation date
5/16/2016 3:42:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CommuNITYGROWTH <br /> I N S T I T U T E <br /> MEMORANDUM Experts in Small Town Planning <br /> Date: October 29, 2009 <br /> To: Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> From: Charles Marohn, City Planner <br /> Re: Oppidan Applications <br /> For the November 5 special meeting, we will be reviewing an application that, in all significant respects, <br /> looks exactly like the application that received a unanimously cold reception from the Planning <br /> Commission last summer.At that time, Planning Commission members were not inclined to approve the <br /> application, as submitted.Commission members made clear to the applicant that: <br /> ➢ The road connection south to Pillsbury was not desired and, if it were to be maintained by the <br /> City,was expensive infrastructure that served no significant public purpose. <br /> ➢ A vehicle connection to the north was essential. As an example straight out of the lessons we <br /> learned from the first two Duany videos we watched earlier this year, it made no sense for <br /> residents of the apartments living a mere 1,000 feet away to be forced to drive through city <br /> streets, out to the congested highway and then along the highway corridor to get to the store. <br /> Interconnectivity was deemed critical. <br /> ➢ Pedestrian connections—at a pedestrian scale, not as an afterthought—was also essential. If we <br /> are going to facilitate the replacement of the existing grocery store through subsidy of a <br /> competitor then we had an obligation to ensure that the elderly people that rely on the current <br /> store have the ability to access the new one. Another community-building lesson from the <br /> Duany video series. <br /> ➢ The design was too suburban and did not fit with the character of the community.We discussed <br /> the screening at Von-Ro and the Kline Funeral Home (where we just did an enforcement action <br /> for the removal of underbrush) as a model for the intentions of our screening provisions. <br /> ➢ If higher impervious coverage were desired via a rezoning to Downtown Mixed Use, the site <br /> design would need to abandon its highway orientation and adopt of downtown orientation.This <br /> meant,for starters,a reorientation of the parking to be to the rear of the lot. <br /> Besides time and many hours of negotiation, there are only a couple of significant things that have <br /> transpired since the original plan,which is now again in front of us,was rejected. <br /> The first is that the City of Peauot Lakes approved SuperValu's permit, along with tax subsidies that <br /> were approved by the City Council. That permit, as approved, resolved the initial concerns of the <br /> Planning Commission and provided for a grocery store that not only met the needs of the applicant but <br /> was consistent with the vision, plans and regulations of the City. No variances were needed and,just as <br /> importantly, no tortured interpretations of the Code were required. <br /> 14084 Baxter Drive, Suite 7 1 Baxter, Minnesota 56425 1 866.900.3064 1 www.communitygrowth.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.