Laserfiche WebLink
COMMUNITYGROWTH (Chy of <br /> I N S T I T U T E Pequot <br /> F..nce rt in Small 7olrrr Planning Ld�es-� <br /> complements and does not detract from the natural, scenic and cultural <br /> �. amenities unique to Pequot Lakes",. The same section of the plan indicates that <br /> "Many new developments follow suburban patterns and design guidelines, <br /> resulting in look-alike cities. All new developments.....should incorporate Pequot <br /> Lakes' small town feel and cultural heritage in their layout and design." This is <br /> done primarily through the screening and impervious coverage limitations, the <br /> latter of which provide spacing and green space consistent needed along the <br /> highway. The city welcomes traditional big box construction, but under the City's <br /> standards for highway oriented development. <br /> • We welcome the applicant's request for rezoning to Downtown Mixed Use, but <br /> developing in the DMU necessitates a change in approach that, so far, the <br /> applicant has been unwilling to make. That change not only involves a more <br /> liberal approach on screening and coverage limits from the City, but a <br /> reorientation of the design consistent with urban development. The first step of <br /> such a reorientation would be flipping the parking and the structure on the site. <br /> • The applicant has indicated that moving the building to the front would not be <br /> possible. It is not clear why this is the case, and we are all aware of downtown <br /> commercial areas — like much of Pequot Lakes - where the stores are built close <br /> to the road to provide for an urban sense of place. <br /> • To facilitate a discussion on modifying the site to an urban orientation, we have <br /> prepared a brief sketch where we cut out and taped their building on the site in a <br /> new location. While design professionals could do a much better job than this <br /> five-minute sketch,this simple step reveals a number of things: <br /> �-- o First, it is physically possible.The structure fits on the site and can still <br /> allow highway access,facilitate a filling station visible from the highway <br /> and provide adequate parking room. <br /> o A backage road can be provided across the property,consistent with prior <br /> plans put together for development of this area. <br /> o The rationale for TIF starts to emerge, including not just the demolition of <br /> the Bradmor,but also the construction of a backage road connection and <br /> a sidewalk system to make a physical connection to the downtown as well <br /> as a realignment of the City's watermain.These are corrections to the site <br /> that serve a public purpose,not simply a direct subsidy. <br /> These are staff comments, and we have been providing this feedback consistently since <br /> this application was first made. We urge the Planning Commission to provide their own <br /> feedback so that the Staff and applicant can understand how members would like this <br /> application to proceed over the coming month. We also request that the Planning <br /> Commission direct another DRT meeting on this application be held following the City <br /> Council meeting. <br /> Finally, Mn/DOT has weighed in on this application in the form of a letter from Ken <br /> Larson.A couple of thoughts on their letter: <br /> 1 Pequot Lakes Comprehensive Plan,page 16 <br /> Pequot Lakes Staff Report 3(c)-5 <br /> August 20,2009 <br />