My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10 - P & Z Admin Report
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
12-16-2010 Planning Commission Meeting
>
10 - P & Z Admin Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2016 3:42:47 PM
Creation date
5/13/2016 3:42:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10.The strict interpretation of the Ordinance would not create undue hardship <br /> for the modification of the existing dwelling. The property owners are <br /> allowed to replace the existing dwelling with a dwelling of the exact <br /> dimensions. Additionally, there is ample room on the property for <br /> construction of a conforming dwelling. <br /> 11.The strict interpretation of the Ordinance would not be impractical because <br /> of circumstances relating to lot size, shape, topographic, or other <br /> characteristics of the property not created by the land owner. The only <br /> impediment to constructing a conforming dwelling as a replacement to the <br /> non-conforming structure is the placement of the garage, which is a <br /> condition created by the property owner. <br /> 12.The deviation from the Ordinance would not be in keeping with the spirit <br /> and intent of the Ordinance. The ordinance allows for the ongoing <br /> maintenance of existing non-conforming structures, but requires new <br /> structures to conform to the code. <br /> 13.The variance will not create a land use not permitted in the zone. The <br /> variance is for a residential dwelling, which is an allowable use in the <br /> Shoreline Residential Zone. <br /> 14.The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> 15.The variance is not for economic reasons alone, but reasonable use of the <br /> property does exist under the ordinance. <br /> On the Installation of the SSTS: <br /> 16.The strict interpretation of the Ordinance would create an undue hardship <br /> for the installation of a SSTS. There does not appear to be adequate <br /> space, without encroaching into the sideyard and lakes setbacks, for a <br /> private sewer system. <br /> 17.The strict interpretation of the Ordinance would be impractical because of <br /> circumstances relating to lot size, shape, topographic, or other <br /> characteristics of the property not created by the land owner. The subject <br /> property has topographic limitations that restrict the areas suitable for <br /> SSTS installation. <br /> 18.The deviation from the Ordinance with any attached conditions will still be <br /> in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Ordinance. <br /> 19.The variance will not create a land use not permitted in the zone. The <br /> variance is for placement of an SSTS, which is an allowable use in the <br /> Shoreline Residential Zone. <br /> 20.The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> 21.The variance is not for economic reasons alone, but reasonable use of the <br /> property does not exist under the Ordinance. <br /> Please note that the Board of Adjustment included the following conditions in <br /> their motion to approve your variance request: <br /> 1. All of the structures on the property shall be guttered and the stormwater <br /> shall be directed to rain gardens. <br /> �. 2. The proposed plan for removal of impervious surfaces shall be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.