My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07.01 - Bids for New Fire Engine
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2012
>
08-07-2012 Council Meeting
>
07.01 - Bids for New Fire Engine
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2014 5:52:21 PM
Creation date
12/19/2013 3:35:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br />PEQUOT LAKES FIRE DEPARTMENT <br />4638 County Road 11 Pequot Lakes, MN 56472 (218)568-8201 Fax (218)568-7672 <br />�ae���i��ttil �i;j��c��tc�tl;i�.�,-tltn `Jt�ti <br />TO: Pequot Lakes Mayor Adams & City Council <br />�ROM: Tom Nelson, Ghief <br />DATE: July 30, 2012 <br />RE: Purchase — New Fire Engine <br />We are looking to purchase a new Rescue/Engine; 1250 GPM pump, 1,000 gallon tank, passenger <br />space for 6 firefighters, equipped with foam, room for tools/hose, extrication equipment, etc.... <br />Approximate cost for this vehicle is $350,000. <br />We will be submitting specific spec's for bids this fall. <br />We will be replacing 2 of our existing vehicles with this newer truck. <br />With an aging fleet, we have been working on schedule to update trucks as needed. We have spoken <br />with the USDA representative and have found a competitive loan that fits our budgeted amount. <br />� <br />This last year we received our latest IS� test results, while we did well and our ratings went down for <br />the City of Pequot Lakes, we didn't getting enough points to get our rural areas down to a seven. The <br />main reason for this was lack of another Class A engine; for our rural area, we need to have 3 Class A <br />Engines in our fleet. We are trying to lower the ISO rating for the cities and townships we serve. We <br />currently have 3 engines: 2003 Peterbilt (meets Class A requirements), 1995 Ford (meets Class A <br />requirements) and 1978 Ford — this does not meet standards. Without a newer engine we will not be <br />able to lower our ISO rating below an 8. In talking with the ISO representative, it was stated that in <br />getting a newer engine, we wvuld almost be guaranteed a lower rating (to a 7). The 1978 Ford is one <br />of the trucks we will be getting rid of. <br />We have the funds available in our budget to make the payments that were discussed with the USDA <br />representative. Our budget has a line item labeled Debt Service. Currently we have $18,000 a year <br />in this line item for our 2003 Peterbilt payment. We paid off the 2003 Peterbilt this year. We would <br />like to continue leaving that line item for the purchase of this new RescuelEngine. The Debt Service <br />line item will be increased to $24,OQ0, this will not increase our budget — we will decrease the amount <br />of our Capital Outlay Carryover to keep our budget the same. I have discussed this with both Sandy <br />and Nancy M. <br />If you have any questions please let me know. <br />Thank you, <br />`-- ,� ��-�.��- <br />Tom Nelson, Chief <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.