My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4A - Variance to Replace Non-Conforming Structure with Larger Dwelling within Lake Setback
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
09-16-2010 Planning Commission Meeting
>
4A - Variance to Replace Non-Conforming Structure with Larger Dwelling within Lake Setback
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2016 2:53:56 PM
Creation date
5/13/2016 2:53:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pursuant to the Pequot Lakes City Ordinance, Section 170.040, the applicant should be prepared at <br /> the public hearing to explain the unique hardship for the proposed variance. A hardship is defined <br /> as a condition whereby the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br /> conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances <br /> unique to his property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute a hardship if <br /> reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Ordinance. <br /> (1) What are the unique circumstances of the parcel size, shape, topography or other <br /> characteristic that m e strict int> retatio of the Ordinance im acd ? <br /> A d �`o GiKc° /Jt ? S�frXgc'A <br /> o �7o."e - Q r e (4Yr1 0OA c <br /> Zo icy r- m z,,r� /� o S <br /> s s 0&4 Gr1;'�706c <br /> (2) How is granting this variance consistent with the intent of the City of Pequot Lakes Land Use <br /> or Subdivision Ordinan ? <br /> �j/ �,),'/� <br /> QW S u 0-- I Al //l <br /> (3) How will reasonable use of the parcel be deprived if the variance is not granted? <br /> /) C VS7�/J7 /�Ji /fin T <br /> (4) What other options, either conforming or non-conforming, have been considered and why <br /> were those options not chosen? <br /> ro,5,71 <br /> a 5e ir?Prc-f V-- �'fr I, ,". S q 0 u <br /> O-A CP 1?e r, Lo.u . j-0 1 2AC z,7/C- o /1 el/ Me"a; 1 vt5 e? <br /> I <br /> (5) Describe the impact on the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity. If <br /> there is no impact,explain why. / / <br /> 7azP s 40 /rtng( c� � C �1 _�� /t� � Q� �C� �✓P,S�IE' <br /> I <br /> 3 REV. MAR 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.