My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7B - Discussion on Commercial Buildings
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
09-16-2010 Planning Commission Meeting
>
7B - Discussion on Commercial Buildings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2016 2:53:23 PM
Creation date
5/13/2016 2:53:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
business that provides 25 jobs, looking to 25 locals businesses to each add one new job. This local-focus <br /> is enhanced by the scale of commercial activity that takes place. <br /> Our downtown is the place where we have the greatest level of public investment in terms of <br /> infrastructure. The downtown is also a place of intense private investment in terms of the number and <br /> value of commercial properties. To maximize these investments, the city needs a strategy that allows for <br /> more intense development on a framework that actually improves property values with each new <br /> private investment. <br /> In other words, each new private investment needs to add value to adjoining properties and improve <br /> the overall public space. This can only be done where form is the predominant regulatory consideration, <br /> not use or function. <br /> ➢ Should the city consider regulations similar to those adopted in Grand Marais, which has sought <br /> to promote a variety of local businesses by limiting the size of commercial buildings in the <br /> downtown? The Grand Marais ordinance limits buildings in the downtown to 6,000 square feet <br /> of retail space. <br /> Should the city consider regulations that would require review of architectural design for <br /> buildings that have the potential to degrade the public realm? These would be buildings that <br /> could, by their design, create a void space that would become a barrier to pedestrian traffic. For <br /> example, a Conditional Use Permit could be required for new commercial buildings greater than <br /> 30-feet wide to ensure that the design remains pedestrian-scaled, and not auto-scaled. <br /> ➢ Should the city consider making the Grow Zone standards required or the default set of <br /> requirements for downtown properties? <br /> Is the continued placement of big-box retailers a concern that the Planning Commission wants <br /> to research further? <br /> 31 Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.