Laserfiche WebLink
DMU SC UR <br /> All members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> APPLICANT: Jeff Garland,L & J Investments <br /> Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit for a Dog Boarding/Daycare Business <br /> Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. Applicant was present. Finding of Fact#16 has <br /> a minor edit. Mr. Marohn stated that this use is allowed in the Rural Residential zone <br /> because this would be the best location for this type of business:,`The operation is <br /> commercial in nature, the surrounding properties are not. Mr. Garland stated that there <br /> will be no outdoor kennels, only indoor kennels wit + need area outside. <br /> a�. <br /> Public Comment: M <br /> Diane Simchuck, 5730 Lund Road—She disagre t appropriate area. She <br /> enjoys the peace and quiet in the country and doesn � ��to I"ten to dogs barking. <br /> Quiet time is from 10 to 6 and they will be exercisingznning through the daytime <br /> hours. She has a dog and the kennels she takes her dogs tee not in a residential <br /> neighborhood. There will be an increase in hose and she ,ghk have to worry about <br /> dogs barking. Twenty-five dogs is too many. The dog g onif <br /> f dig is okay. When one dog <br /> barks they all bark. The ap llcant's residence is in iss a and they will be watching by <br /> camera. She lives nextc} ` el and dirt move tole country to enjoy country life <br /> to live next to a ke� V, <br /> ' £+ <br /> George Selvestra, 3120 � , 'ye He has a home behind and retired to enjoy the <br /> v <br /> peace and quiet ntle woo � � a e� '������and windows open and doesn't want to <br /> listen to dogs barking at 6 Al ; �his is strictly a residential area. If the business would <br /> be grooming only that'would beuation,but it is a kennel with a grooming service. <br /> He prefers no commercial establis ' nts in the area and agrees with what Diane said. <br /> Verne Olson; l 160Eastwood Drive—He echoes some of George's comments and has no <br /> problems with a small business but is opposed to 25 dogs barking. Some neighbors have <br /> dogs and they are petty well controlled. He can hear dogs barking a half-mile away. He <br /> has two questions: V&is the animals units permitted for that acreage and does Pequot <br /> Lakes have any specific noise ordinance applicable to this situation. <br /> Ken Larson, 31264 Eastwood Drive—He is concerned about the existing dwelling and it <br /> not being occupied with anyone from the business. It is unusual not having the owner <br /> living on site. He has the same concerns about the noise and it seems like it was <br /> presented as a grooming business with kennel boarding. A friend lives i/4 mile from <br /> Hunt's Point and on calm days he can hear the dogs barking. From his line of work trees <br /> are not an effective sound barrier. He lives the furthest away from the business and is <br /> concerned with the amount of noise. He has no objection to a lot of types of businesses <br /> MINUTES 3 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> June 17, 2010 <br />