Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Brown stated that she would like to see Pequot Lakes without electronic signs. The <br /> ordinance would need to be changed to allow this. There are a lot of unsightly reader <br /> boards out there. <br /> Mr. Marohn stated that as Staff he has been very clear from the beginning that this would <br /> be an issue. <br /> A motion was made by Tom Woog, seconded by Deb Brown,to deny the electronic <br /> reader board. ROLL CALL VOTE: Mr. Habein:Nay; Ms. Brown: Aye; Mr. Pederson: <br /> Nay; Mr. Woog: Aye. Motion fails®2 Aye, 2 Nay. <br /> Councilman Nagel stated he feels bad as the City has tried to be user friendly and <br /> encouraging to entrepreneurship. <br /> A motion was made by Scott Pederson, seconded bFilnHabein,to approve the <br /> electronically lit reader board with the stipulatio n can change once p&day per 12 hour <br /> period and can only be on during business ho al a,&Woog called for the vote: 2 <br /> Aye, 2 Nay. Motion fails. r v <br /> a <br /> A motion was made by Deb Brown, seconded by Sco <br /> R"I",tt ��rson,to table the digital <br /> reader board until next month. All members voted"aye". ycarried. <br /> When asked by Mr. Kaneski, Mr. Marohn stated t lighting plan meets the intent of <br /> the approval in March <br /> ��" a <br /> APPLICANT: Dav � Fnned <br /> Applicant st ernuf'ermor a Home Occupation <br /> b <br /> Mr. Marohn,expld the Repo� ��icant was not present. Mr. Marohn <br /> explainediat Stahad contact r. Kennedy in writing asking how he wished to <br /> 1� <br /> proceed nd received ji tospons -Mr. Kennedy. The written comment from James <br /> Neuman vas entered into' recor <br /> Mr. Habein stated that Mr.Kennedy had called him that afternoon at 4:30 and stated if <br /> his request was 6a,:going to be approved,he would like it tabled. The neighbors have <br /> concerns with the cd nantS. <br /> A motion was made by Scott Pederson, seconded by Bill Habein,to approve the <br /> Conditional Use Permit for a Home Occupation as the City technically doesn't have <br /> jurisdiction over the covenants presented to us,based on the following Findings of Fact: <br /> 1. All proposed business activities are proposed to be inside buildings. <br /> 2. The use of the property as a residence will remain the primary use. The area <br /> devoted to business operations will be incidental to the structure. <br /> 3. The operation will be entirely within the structure. Retail sales on site will be <br /> limited to appointments only. <br /> Minutes 4 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> April 15, 2010 <br />