Laserfiche WebLink
2. The entire structure will be constructed outside the 75-foot Ordinary High Water <br /> ` setback. <br /> Subject to the following conditions: <br /> 1. The applicant shall ensure that erosion control practices are in place prior to any <br /> construction through the use of silt fencing or other erosion control measures. <br /> 2. A stormwater management plan shall be implemented after construction. The plan <br /> shall be prepared for staff to review and approve prior to implementation. <br /> All members voted"aye". Motion carried. � �z <br /> APPLICANT: Brian Laudenbach firr2 {fi{ <br /> Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit for Ad al a in DMU <br /> District(continuation) r. 4 <br /> Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. Applicantwas not present but jepresented <br /> by Sean Kaneski, Kuepers Construction and D Queen. Mr. Kaneskr p b ut new <br /> �F�,,� <br /> drawings of the signs and site plan. <br /> When asked,Mr. Marohn stated the t issue is the sign concept plan,the active <br /> application. The Planning Commissic 'a. ` oved the Cor n%tional Use Permit for the <br /> Drive-Thru last month. Mr. Kaneski st ds the Plan*Commission to act on <br /> F l <br /> the signs. s t <br /> Mr. Adams stated the Planning°Commission air hal tan email and read it into the <br /> record. That email will become part of these" inutes. The Staff Report includes a lot of <br /> information on signs as well as information frog /DOT. The Sign Ordinance was <br /> discussed and Mr.Marohn gxplairid the Srgn , ncept Plan and what they are asking for <br /> as a freest <br /> AK i <br /> Mr. ski stated th ,,now AJfffth sign being requested, a Preview Sign. <br /> MN/DOl tated that o "of the freestanding signs encroaches in their right-of-way <br /> and needs to moved. th existing freestanding signs are nonconforming—they <br /> both exceed he d o xceeds size also. The digital reader is also an aspect. This <br /> process has a lot o on on the part of the Planning Commission. <br /> Mr. Kaneski stated'tie landscaping rock is being removed from the bottom of the sign. <br /> The posts are not being removed;they do not encroach in the right-of-way. The one post <br /> is 9.5 inches from the right-of-way and is within the 1-foot setback from the lot line. The <br /> size of the sign above is being made smaller as it hangs over the right-of-way. He stated <br /> they plan reducing the size of the sign by 42.3%; the height will remain the same. <br /> Mr. Marohn stated the sign in nonconforming; it is too tall,too big and encroaches in the <br /> setback. The issue the Planning Commission needs to address is once you start redoing <br /> it, it becomes a new sign. Mr. Kaneski stated they are lessening the size. <br /> Minutes 5 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> March 18, 2010 <br />