Laserfiche WebLink
Action on the digital reader board was tabled until the April Planning Commission <br /> meeting. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: Mr. Habein,Aye; Ms. Brown, Aye; Mr. Derksen,Nay; Mr. <br /> Williams, Aye; Mr. Hallan, Aye, Mr. Pederson,Aye. Motion Carried. Aye 5-Nay 1. <br /> A motion was made by Mark Hallan, seconded by Bill Habein, directing Staff to review <br /> the lighting plan information, confirm that it meets the intent of the approval from our <br /> last meeting and report back to the Planning Commission next month. All members <br /> voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> Staff was directed to look at digital signs. <br /> Mr. 'Williams stated that there seems to be excess tem or signage on the site now. Mr. <br /> Marohn stated Staff is looking into that. The Nor $v C is also being jooked at. Mr. <br /> Williams asked if that constitutes a violation on site. Mr. Marohn stated that the <br /> excess signage is not listed as a violation; it i rnE der irtestigation. <br /> �� <br /> APPLICANT: David Kennedy N r­�� <br /> Applicant requests a Conditional it for a Ho k ccuation <br /> :t <br /> Mr. Kennedy submitted a written request to postpone this puiearing. A motion was <br /> made by Bill Habein, seconded by Mark V"able this lic hearing. All j <br /> ` members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> i <br /> APPLICANT: Tbom`i}s,Link <br /> Applicant requests a Varzance fob'art Accessoiry Structure in Side-Yard Setback <br /> Mr. Maro '` d the tat'f Reportpplcant was present as well as his attorney, <br /> Thomas am <br /> Mr. I ck explame at the P1 ing Commission had made a previous decision on <br /> this matte should not ,� k at this as a review. This is a new application and asked <br /> that the PI ° Commis approach it that way. The applicants are requesting a 4.3 <br /> foot variance re t <br /> He further explained at the property involved is on Middle Cullen Lake and was platted <br /> approximately 90 years ago and does not resemble current standards. There is a <br /> challenging topographic hill to the rear. Neighbor Elaine May did not like the pontoon <br /> trailer being parked on her side of the garage. A very small portion of the garage is <br /> within the setback, 5.7 feet from the property line itself. An area of about 15 square feet <br /> is within the side yard setback. In 2008 the Planning Commission denied their request <br /> for an after-the-fact variance leaving them with the choice of moving the building which <br /> is very costly, a minimum of$8,000 and disruption of the Link property or removing the <br /> garage. <br /> Minutes 10 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> March 18,2010 <br />