Laserfiche WebLink
The Dairy Queen signs proposed for the building were discussed. <br /> Regarding the digital reader sign, Chairman'Woog had suggested amending the <br /> ordinance. This could be decided later. Mr.Kaneski stated he submitted examples of <br /> signs with reader boards. There would be no scrolling,completely fixed with no <br /> graphics,just numbers and letters. They would like to apply technology to what is <br /> already allowed. They plan to change the sign once or twice a day. <br /> When asked, Mr. Kaneski stated he will look into controlling the brightness of that sign. <br /> Auto dimming is available. <br /> f <br /> Mr. Marohn advised there would need to be a motion to ap the overall plan as <br /> outlined earlier with the two conditions and to address siege e building and a <br /> second to table the digital reader sign until a public he is hel at portion of the <br /> ff < <br /> ordinance. , <br /> A motion was made by Mark Hallan, seconded b Deb Brawn, for approv ..........( ' "concept <br /> sign plan as discussed tonight allowing the sign along Truck Highway 371 > modified, <br /> minus the reader board,to allow the three additional signs as discussed, and to table the <br /> digital reader sign, subject to the folly ng Findings of Faet: <br /> Ova <br /> y <br /> 1. The request for a conditional u4 to allow additional free standing signs <br /> along with the redevelopment 9'&&,an e onconforming sign to include a <br /> t <br /> reader board that would not confo *"i Se -7.1(4)(C) which outlaws all <br /> flashing, revolving or termittently, signs S n 17-7.1(5)(A)(6) allows for a <br /> sign concept plan for anything that is t allowed in the sign section. <br /> 2. All signs, except,one of the existing, estanding signs, will met the one foot <br /> setback requirement. The non-conform ng sign is over the property line and <br /> wi #371 _y nglit=i 'according to Mn/DOT. <br /> 3. ` `app i roposmg to reface the existing non-conforming sign. The sign <br /> l not be in d in'ste or height but will be intensified with an electronic <br /> INES <br /> 4' er board. €4 <br /> 4. Th acing of th xisting sign and the additional free standing sign located in <br /> the hru will 8 coordinated to create an overall appearance for the Dairy <br /> Queen a oth "usinesses already established in the existing development. <br /> 5. The existin ��onforming sign is a total of 192 square feet per side for a total <br /> of 384 square 'et. This is a preexisting nonconformity. <br /> 6. The propose directional drive-thru sign is approximately three and a half square <br /> feet (counting both sides) and just under four feet in height. This would be an <br /> extra sign as the property is a corner lot, each side is allowed one free standing <br /> sign and there are already two freestanding signs on the property. <br /> 7. In addition to the two existing, free-standing signs and the proposed directional <br /> drive-thru sign, the applicant is proposing an order menu sign for the drive-thru. <br /> This sign is approximately 40 square feet and just under eight feet in height. This <br /> sign would be behind the proposed building and only visible to drive-thru traffic. <br /> Minutes 8 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> March 18, 2010 <br />