Laserfiche WebLink
Ms.Brown stated her issue is the impervious coverage which has already been brought <br /> UP. <br /> When asked by Mr. Williams,Mr.Laudenbach stated the septic tank indicated on the <br /> Certificate of Survey has been removed. Mr. Williams stated he visited the site and the <br /> area is grass and dirt,not Class 5;black topping that area will increase the impervious <br /> coverage. <br /> Mr. Pederson asked what the plans were for the area west of the prk ng area in the rear <br /> of the existing building. Mr. Halbert stated the area could be1yeetated. Mr. Pederson <br /> stated there might be a slight gain in the impervious co ere was a vegetation <br /> plan. <br /> St.1}�3V <br /> Mr. Williams stated the sign may be the largest, o rming sign i l`'b n,possibly <br /> being 3 times the size allowed. It may also be tallest. %)Nhen asked,lalbert <br /> stated the water from the new addition will s :r e wes � ,ere will be niter <br /> shedding to the east. There will be no change to th , y on e gas purri rs or the <br /> propane filling tank. <br /> Mr. Pederson referred to Finding of Fa� 0 for the Dri He suggested adding <br /> ct ,ri �E�t <br /> restaurant to the first sentence- The p�p ��� lwvutd be "erstdrive-thru <br /> restaurant in this area The banks and th9ost,Qf" ydrive-thru's. <br /> d rv, ti `S ~ 1 <br /> Mr.Adams asked if ghtin was needed, it is referred to in a Finding. Mr. <br /> Marohn stated a 1i plan i requiremeni s the Code. This parcel probably doesn't <br /> meet the code currentl ge too much 1 dt. Mr.K.aneski stated they submitted a <br /> lighting lan the D al �� ated a lighting plan should have been <br /> gp 4 <br /> submitted <br /> , "f"tid"At ,The Pl g Commission will need to see that and it <br /> will need to c A ated that the plans submitted were for the entire <br /> parse asked if the tgn w N removed. Mr. Laudenbach stated the BP sign <br /> was ho p andfathere Mr. arohn asked to clarify their request: 2 free standing <br /> h �� <br /> signs alon ` ughway, one existing and one refaced. Mr. Laudenbach stated they are <br /> asking for why currelty have,refacing one with a new panel. <br /> �� <br /> Mr. Derksen asked the reader board. This is a school zone and the City didn't <br /> allow Lakes State B to have one or the school;this is an intersection with school <br /> traffic. Mr. Kaneski stated it is not proposed`to be a flashing graphic board. The sign is <br /> too high and it is difficult to affix the numbers and letters. It would be changed digitally <br /> between a fixed Dairy Queen sign and a fixed liquor store sign. The sign will not scroll. <br /> Mr. Hallan stated that the impervious calculations are not correct. The area is very <br /> compacted and could be at 95%. There is approximately a 60 foot buffer being left`on <br /> the west;the storwater should go underground to the vegetated buffer area where it can <br /> infiltrate. The City is redoing West Lake Street and their stormwater is going under the <br /> Minutes 2 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> Special Meeting <br /> February 22,2010 <br />