Laserfiche WebLink
1 Tax Revenue=Estimated Market Value x Tax Classification Rate x ritv Tax Rate <br /> 2 Tax Revenue=S6 600 000 x 2% x 65 = 85 838 <br /> 3 wa to measure the return on the Business Park is to consider a theoretical analysis: If the Cit of Pe got Lakes <br /> 4 had not develo ed the Business Park#n 1996 buff was instead iven the o ortun# to acre tthe ark toda with <br /> 5 the current rate of develo ment at the inflation-ad'usted cost of 2.03 million3 would this be a wise investment? <br /> 6 iot if the ob`ective was to lower the overall tax burden° If the Cit financed the ro'ect at 4 and devoted eve <br /> 7 tinned to rise hv 30M <br /> 8 er ear it would take 29 ears for the ark to cover the cost of its creation. DurinO that time the ro art taxes <br /> 9 aid b the businesses in the ark wou#d cover onE debt re a went. The costs of snow lowin street <br /> 10 maintenance ol#ce and fire rotection and other services rovided'to the ark would have to be aid b the rest <br /> 11 of the tax base. <br /> 12 C?f course this wou#d be a better scenario than the ro'ect as it was actuall undertaken.1fhile the actual ro'ect <br /> 13 cost was handled u -front the tax revenue to Da i for it did not a ear until man ears later.A number of the lots <br /> 14 were iven awe busindsses were enticed with tax incentives and further ublic Im rovements enhanced the <br /> 15 s#stance with the prnipct from a strictl tax revenue <br /> 16 stand Dint the Business Park was a bad investment for the Cit . As the infrastructure in the ark a es and needs <br /> 17 increased maintenance It will be critical that that tax base of the exist! oark increase sufficient to cover this <br /> 18 ion wterm IiaEailit . <br /> 19 What this analysis does not factor in is the value of the 'obs created within the park. The business #nvento <br /> 20 conducted in 2003 indicates that there were a romi-itply 200 in within industrial ark rd ert .While the net <br /> 21 cost- er-'ob is an elusive fi ore the industrial ark should not be ex ended for the sake of crest#n °obs without a <br /> 22 ri orous financial com arison of the costs and like# outcomes of other°obs creation initiatives, <br /> 23 Downtown <br /> 24 In 2009,the city established a"Grow Zone"throughout the downtown commercial areas.In searching for a way to <br /> 25 reduce regulations and streamline the permitting process for businesses, an alternative set of standards were <br /> 26 developed for this area. Instead of the standard zoning approach,which prohibits any use not specifically allowed, <br /> 27 the Grow Zone standards instead allow nearly all uses and focus instead on the form new construction takes. <br /> 28 Where this form is compatible with the existing development pattern, not only does it add to the "destination <br /> 29 effect" of the downtown, but approvals can be made very quickly. Property owners seeking to make <br /> 30 improvements to a property within the Grow Zone may choose to either utilize the Grow Zone standards or stick <br /> 31 with the traditional approach. <br /> 32 Highway 371 Corridor <br /> 33 Outside of the downtown the Hl hwa 371 corridor has develo ed in an auto-oriented nattern, For the most arfi <br /> 34 this develo ment is not tied to munici al utilities and as such has develo ed in a somewhat random distribution. <br /> 35 he cdrrldor includes such vane as a church a contractor ards restaurants and store e units amon st other <br /> 36 lases. There are areas where develo meat is Blustered to ether and other areas where there are lar e a s <br /> There are lots owned b a tax-exe—rit reli 7ious institution and ro art still owned b the Cit of Pe not Lakes. <br /> Aceordin to the inflation calculator at www°waste com inf#anon 1.54 million in 1996 is inflation ad'usted to <br /> 2.08 million#n 2009. <br /> 111 Page <br />