Laserfiche WebLink
1. The property is properly zoned Rural Residential, Open Space, Shoreline <br /> Residential and Transition Residential. Tract A is currently used for residential <br /> purposes while Tract B is vacant and does not have a use established. <br /> 2. Tract A would meet the minimum requirements for the Rural Residential district <br /> when it is combined with the parcel abutting it to the north. Tract B would meet <br /> the minimum requirements for the Transition Residential, Open Space, and <br /> Shoreline Residential districts. <br /> 3. Both Tracts A and B have more than 20,000 square feet of buildable area.Neither <br /> Tract A nor Tract B would be constrained from future development. <br /> 4. There are not any nonconforming structures located on Tract A or Tract B. <br /> 5. The survey does not indicate the impervious surface coverage for Tract A but it is <br /> evident that it is less than 15 percent. Tract B does iaot contain any impervious <br /> surface coverage. <br /> 6. The roe is suitable in its natural state fob tie intended ose and this lot <br /> property <br /> split would not be harmful to the health, saf "'ibr.welfare o e residents or of <br /> the community. <br /> 7. It is assumed that Tract A contains a 5f�� ,as it eo tams two existh stiu*1 ings. <br /> sfig � r <br /> Tract B does not contain a SSTS and statttiting to venfy whether soils <br /> information is available from the local Sw`� I sand whether that is sufficient to i <br /> ME <br /> verify the suitability of the site.for two sewer site <br /> 8. The applicant is not proposing1nprovisions for a� ,based recreation. <br /> 9. Both tracts will conform to the miri �require., en l four zoning districts <br /> ti. <br /> they encompass. <br /> j. <br /> t' 10. The proposed lots aft unique in that they are"' <br /> re t uttly split due to Highway 371 <br /> and County c� � the existmgtot lines are compatible with the layout of <br /> existing pr £ y"sties m area and wi not constrain future development of <br /> adjoining esn <br /> 11. The existing 10i"2 and nit at right angles to existing road lines but <br /> g � � -of--way in this unique area. <br /> folly% Q ttm o <br /> 12 8± Traci" d Trat meet the minimum frontage on public right-of-way <br /> �quirement o�� � <br /> �� <br /> 4hsh,«} z eet Y .. <br /> Sub� he following ftdltxcm: <br /> L Ups&� proval, their`portion of the property that is zoned Rural Residential (Tract <br /> A) sh�� e submitt�' to Crow Wing County for a lot consolidation with Parcel <br /> 290101 <br /> OLD BUSINESS: <br /> a. Comprehensive Plan Discussion— <br /> There was no update on the sections previously discussed. <br /> APPROVAL OF°MINUTES: <br /> A motion was made by Mark Hallan, seconded by John Derksen,to approve the <br /> December Minutes, as corrected. All members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> Minutes 4 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> January 21, 2010 <br />