My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9A - Minutes 042811
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
05-19-2011 Planning Commission Meeting
>
9A - Minutes 042811
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2016 11:20:04 AM
Creation date
5/6/2016 11:20:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planned Unit Development. The City Attorney will need to approve and see the Title <br /> Opinion. <br /> Mr. Steffens met with Kathy at the Recorder's Office and sent her the Statutes. She will <br /> get back to him on what needs to take place. The mortgage holders have been notified as <br /> well as all owners. A Certificate of Resolution will be submitted indicating all ownership <br /> has voted and approved this. The title work will be delivered to Paul Sandelin, City <br /> Attorney,next week. Mr. Marohn asked to be copied with the communications with Mr. <br /> Sandelin;he will need to coordinate the rental documents and the amended Declaration. <br /> Mr. Marohn stated that timing is important; the applicant has requested Final Plat <br /> approval at the Planning Commission meeting May 19th, a Special Council meeting May <br /> 23rd and plan to have the plat recorded shortly thereafter. This i$'�very complex <br /> situation and the City Attorney needs to be looking atoll of this soon. <br /> Mr. Steffens stated the Vegetative Enhancement1an is unchanged from�J,what had been <br /> received. Mr. Marohn stated the City Engine,!f,ga <br /> s not nd to look at the Utilities Plan. <br /> They are not public utilities; the City is not taking in oy,," "NoT <br /> ,y�,,j <br /> A he MPCA es the <br /> Ile' approves <br /> plans. One of the Conditions does state that the PI to be reviewed by the City <br /> Engineer. <br /> The Grading and other Plans were not pfpp�4by WSN. <br /> Mr. Hallan asked when the !Rlicant will need to obia"In",the NPDES Permit and at what <br /> point we want them tobc <br /> %4PCA appro�ai of the wastewater treatment system, the <br /> * <br /> SDS permit. Mr. hn stat I <br /> I would be part of the building permit process,the land <br /> use process. Whew gtion r the construction of units come in,the larger approval <br /> would need to be S I <br /> 'being issued. Not Final Plat approval. <br /> Mr. Hallan further a ed e o would not be adequate and when does the <br /> new system nee o, e built. <br /> arohn stated a Compliance Inspection for the old, <br /> existitig"s'Ystem would P requirepliant within 3 years. <br /> Mr. Steffens sated the lar&r sewer system depends on the pace of sales. The MPCA is <br /> more receptive:,,' do as flows,not 100%capacity. Mr. Marohn asked if the flows were <br /> being monitored.`,`Mr. Steffens stated that they are being monitored and are being <br /> reported to the MPCA. Marohn stated he was comfortable with working with the <br /> regulatory agency that oversees it. <br /> Mr. Adams asked if the amenities buildings are being constructed. Mr. Steffens stated <br /> that construction will not begin until June;the cabins have been removed. <br /> Regarding the review of the wastewater plans by the City Engineer, Mr. Hallan stated the <br /> City Engineer is not going to do anything that the MPCA is not going to do. He is more <br /> curious about the grading plans. <br /> MINUTES 6 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> April 28, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.