9A - Minutes 042811 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. Applicant was represented by Chris Quisberg. Mr. Hallan stated that this discussion parallels the Dairy Queen discussions. We are not setting a new precedence; this is what the concept plan is for. Mr. Derksen asked if we hadn't talked about this before. Mr. Marohn stated that the Planning Commission had a fairly lengthy discussion on their earlier signs, approving a certain sign configuration. That was an over-the-counter permit, no issues. That does not preclude SuperValu from coming back asking for more. There was no variance or special provisions with their earlier approval. G When Mr. Adams asked if it would be lit Mr. Quisberg stat ey would need to look at it again; it may need to be a spotlight from above, but vv� �at '� it Mr. Adams stated he was comfortable with the signage butihe squar� otage is a problem. He felt the 33.5 square feet recommended by Staff would be priate. When he asked if anything more than just the, sign was necessary, ' berg stated he had no problem with just the price readers. Mr. Hallan stated that the grocery stoTe was allowed 10%of the fagade for signage. He asked what percentage the storefront 1 � Marohn stated that they are well under 10%for the building itself. Mr. Hallan' ould like to sce the entire plan now, not more later. Mr. Quisberg stated they ave n equesEs for signage, other than for the vacant space indicated on the buil A motion was made by Tom Alums, seconde by Cheri Seils,to approve the request for signage on the canopyp to the Mowed 33.75 ft. of signage on each side, the east s side and the west side, based ofilhe following dings of Fact: 1. The, � � or a c6n4itional use'`p rmit is for signage on an accessory structure, _�� c is n� � wed ,by the Ordinance. Section 17-7.1(5)(A)(6) allows for a z 34z nditional used emit and sign concept plan for anything that is not allowed in � gn section 2. A( �� ,s, existi proposed,meet the one foot setback requirement. 3. The g signa&,`is in conformance with the sign concept plan, approved by the Pi�ComIssion April 15, 2010. 4. The prop os� s�i four signs. Two of the signs will measure 3' x 15' (45 sq. $.) and will rea, "Pequot Lakes Fuel Center". The other signs are manual changeable track system signs and measure 5' x 2.8' (14 sq. ft.). They will be used to display the price of gasoline. An identification sign and a gas price sign is being proposed to be placed on both the east and west sides of the canopy. 5. The applicant is requesting a CUP for a signage that is specifically not allowed in Section 17-7.1(A)(5). The applicant has submitted a sign concept plan. 6. The request for is to allow signage to be placed on an accessory structure (gas canopy). 7. There have not been any alternatives to the sign request submitted. MINUTES 2 Pequot Lakes Planning Commission April 28, 2011