9A - Minutes 051911 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

be disturbed. For any new units to be built, site lines and setbacks will be monitored by Staff and Planning Commission. Mr. Reichenbach stated that trees had been cut down in the Shore Impact Zone previously and he thought this would be a good time to have them replaced. PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED. Mr. Hallan pointed out the City Attorney stated Section 12.8 of the Declaration referring to dockage should be reviewed. This has been discussed at length and Mr. Miller stated there have been no changes. NO,kQ� 4p .......... Mr. Adams asked what the timeline was for implementatio e Vegetation Plan. Mr. Miller stated they would prefer to not disturb any areas to traction. The implementation will be consistent as units are te the construe ' � 11 z ted areas. Screening would apply to the whole property,the whdle'p "inal Plat, A motion was made by Tom Adams, seconded'i"',Mark l4allan,to appro fi based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. The applicant has complied with all of the condfti�pns upon which preliminary approval is expressly conditio d. Specifically,'i reference to the Conditional Use Permit approval of Augus 10, we find the',following: a. Condition I not applica al plat process. b. The applicant has sub ed er, 'management plan that is acceptable to the Planning ssio c. Condition 3hdto pplicable to, PI cess. i d. The Cit y Attori i has Indic red, in a May 9, 2011 letter addressed to 'ttn the amended declarations and rental Da I er, thi, t he has revs and th-- agreeme d-lburict them a bid; hem quate. The Planning Commission has with s ,Opf p e. At 11 28,,�,,2011 regular meeting, the Planning Commission indicated A that the s er plans deed not be reviewed by the City Engineer as they 4 have been by a licensed engineer and are subject to MPCA ersight. applic f e e applic has submitted a vegetation enhancement plan that is a able the Planning Commission. g. Con P not applicable to the final plat process. h. ere,,, e no changes to the Association documents previously approved by the AWIO City. i. The City has received a copy of the applicants NPDES permit application. j. Conditions 10 through 19 are not applicable to the final plat process. 2. The final plat agrees with the approved preliminary plat. There are no changes to the layout, design, density or general configuration from the preliminary plat. 3. The City Attorney has indicated, in a May 9,2011 letter addressed to Dawn Bitmer,that all parties with an interest in the property are properly represented in the final plat documents. MINUTES 2 Pequot Lakes Planning Commission May 19, 2011