My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5A - Ordinance Amendment Regarding Sign Concept Plan Review (continuation)
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2012
>
09-20-2012 Planning Commission Meeting
>
5A - Ordinance Amendment Regarding Sign Concept Plan Review (continuation)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2016 9:26:04 AM
Creation date
5/2/2016 9:26:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COmmur*i rY Gry f <br /> GR0Nv7rH P Ot <br /> INSTITUTE Lakes- <br /> STAFF REPORT <br /> Application: Ordinance Amendment Regarding Sign Concept Plans <br /> Applicant: City of Pequot Lakes <br /> Agenda Item: 4(a) <br /> Background Information: Currently, if a property owner desires more signage than <br /> what is allowed by the Ordinance,they are required to apply for a conditional use permit <br /> and submit a sign concept plan. Once the application is submitted and the fee is paid <br /> (Residential $350 + $46 recording fee, Commercial $450 + $46 recording fee), public <br /> notices are sent and the application is review by the Planning Commission at a public <br /> hearing. If the sign concept plan is approved,the applicant is granted a sign permit. <br /> The existing process is both lengthy and costly. It is also limited to properties in the <br /> Commercial and Industrial Districts. <br /> Because the existing sign ordinance language is fairly restrictive, the sign concept plan <br /> allows property owners some flexibility with the code. The sign concept plan allows <br /> property owners the opportunity to increase the number, size or height of signage on <br /> their property. It does not, however, allow property owners to obtain signage that is <br /> currently not allowed by the ordinance. <br /> The proposed ordinance amendment reduces the cost of obtaining a permit for <br /> additional signage by not requiring a conditional use permit. The amendment only <br /> requires the property owner to submit a sign concept plan to be reviewed by the <br /> Planning Commission. The proposed amendment also allows property owners in all <br /> zoning districts of the City the opportunity to submit a sign concept plan (they are only <br /> allowed for commercial properties now). <br /> The review criteria for a sign concept plan is not changing with the proposed <br /> amendment. Currently,public notices must be published and individual notices must be <br /> sent to all property owners within 350' of the subject property as part of the CUP/public <br /> hearing requirement. With the proposed amendment, a public hearing would not be <br /> required and neighboring properties will only be noticed if the sign concept plan is for a <br /> residentially zoned property. <br /> At the last Planning Commission Meeting, it was suggested that a $ioo fee should apply <br /> to all sign concept plan applications. The fee would cover expenses associated with the <br /> application including staff time, mailings(for residential zones),paperwork, etc. <br /> Planning Commission Direction:The Planning Commission may either recommend <br /> that the application be approved or denied, with or without changes to the text provided <br /> here. The Planning Commission should also recommend a fee (if any) for sign concept <br /> plan applications. <br /> Staff Recommendation: The proposed amendment creates a flexible, streamlined, <br /> and less costly process for property owners while still allowing the Planning Commission <br /> to review signage requests on a case-by-case basis. We recommend the proposed <br /> amendment be approved. <br /> Pequot Lakes Staff Report 4(a)-1 <br /> September 20,2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.