My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 - Grow Zone Expansion
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2012
>
09-20-2012 Planning Commission Meeting
>
3 - Grow Zone Expansion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2016 9:26:02 AM
Creation date
5/2/2016 9:25:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with bituminous. Buildings continue to add bulk and parking would be on street or <br /> accessed through an alley. No curb cuts across the sidewalk. <br /> Drawing 3 <br /> As properties continue to mature and increase their intensity, the four foot gap between <br /> the walk and the building can be filled in with additional sidewalk. This will allow <br /> outdoor seating and/or awnings that extend within the right-of-way. The roadway can be <br /> widened by another nine feet, paving up to the edge of the sidewalk,to provide for <br /> diagonal parking. <br /> Drawing 4 <br /> Once the blocks have matured to full intensity(3+ story buildings with no gaps between <br /> structures), there will be sufficient tax base to justify the installation of storm sewer. This <br /> won't necessitate ripping out all of the sidewalk but it will require some of it to be <br /> removed along with the road. This would be done. In this condition there would be a full <br /> 10.5' walk on each side of the street, diagonal parking and two way traffic. <br /> Some notes: <br /> ➢ It is important to understand how these improvements would be financed.The base <br /> scenario is the city's responsibility;we've essentially committed to that already. <br /> Reducing the scale of the street section where there is little or no development can help <br /> keep that obligation reasonable. <br /> All of the other improvements can be phased in as development happens on the <br /> �. adjacent property in essentially a lot by lot basis.That means property owners can do <br /> them at the time the property is developed or they can ask the city to do them and <br /> assess the costs back to the property owner. Either way, it does not require the city to <br /> build infrastructure that won't be fully utilized, it keeps the long term obligations of the <br /> city proportionate to the tax base and it allows everyone—city and property owners— <br /> to cash flow improvements more reliably. <br /> ➢ Two sides of a street can be different with this approach, depending on their level of <br /> private sector investment.Temporary(inexpensive) measures can be taken to fill in gaps <br /> in the sidewalk and parking areas, but they wouldn't need to be. <br /> ➢ Stormwater would be handled onsite in the early phases and then with a combination of <br /> on-site filtration and pervious pavements in the middle phases.Only in the final phase <br /> would storm sewer be needed.Again,this is a cash flow advantage.We don't want to <br /> build an expensive stormwater system if we don't have the tax base to sustain it. <br /> ➢ Another aspect to this phasing approach would be to examine trees and lighting.We've <br /> not done this yet, but certainly should as we proceed. Running conduit and planting <br /> small trees in strategic locations will save the city immense sums of money for little cost <br /> today. <br /> Pequot Lakes Staff Report <br /> September 20,2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.