My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9 - Minutes 011912
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2012
>
02-16-2012 Planning Commission Meeting
>
9 - Minutes 011912
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2016 12:21:15 PM
Creation date
4/29/2016 12:21:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Adams suggested bringing together members of the EDC, Chamber and maybe <br /> property owners along the corridor to discuss how development should proceed along the <br /> corridor and come back to the Planning Commission and City Council with a <br /> recommendation. The stakeholders would have an opportunity to say what they are <br /> thinking and use that as an action plan to address what Council Member Akerson is <br /> talking about and what the business people located in the center of the City are talking <br /> about. <br /> Council Member Akerson stated that if there were some type of elopment along the <br /> corridor a certain percentage of traffic going by would see bus' se d stop and come <br /> in to town. <br /> Chairman Pederson stated that including a map highli t whet ercial zones <br /> exist along the bypass and where County Road 11 ' t would b ood idea. There <br /> is substantial commercial property at both ends in the middle alrea sting. <br /> Mr. Marohn stated that as part of the discussion, 'es t going to b to the <br /> east side of the alignment. The west side is going to veloped all the way out to the <br /> highway with commercial at the inte ction;there is n now. We will need to wait <br /> for what happens. Development will on the west Th east side zoning <br /> doesn't change from what it is today. n that pas ooked at engineers' <br /> costs to run utilities out there, skipping eve o s,w d not pay. <br /> 4 f } <br /> Mr. Habein stated it is le for exis g busine s to pay for utilities for new <br /> businesses along th' w rout <br /> Chairman Pederson state a 'omn ion cannot supersede a resolution from <br /> the City C <br /> No. rk plan does ddr 11 park: <br /> Mr. explained th . De en had brought up ball park construction, a <br /> mumcip ' ark. Co un Member Akerson stated that we don't know how long the <br /> school can t e liabili community use of the school fields. Chairman Pederson <br /> and Mrs. Sells s that s should be a Park Plan action item. Chairman Pederson <br /> pointed out that tr ms and bike and snowmobile trails are included in the Plan. <br /> Ms. Brown questioned whether or not we want to make Pequot Lakes a destination for <br /> ball games in the summer months. Softball tournaments are huge. <br /> No.3. Same action items in multiple locations: <br /> Mr. Marohn explained that this was done intentionally and reinforces many of the <br /> strategies. He will provide an example. <br /> No. 4. Americans love autos—we can't change that mentality, social engineering: <br /> MINUTES 2 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> December 15, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.