9 - Minutes 11-15-2012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3. The lot area of the proposed lot exceeds the minimum buildable area of 10,000 `- square feet. 4. All of the existing structures on the proposed lot meet the setback requirements of the Commercial Zone. 5. The proposed lot is served by the municipal sanitary sewer and water systems. There is not a need for extensions for the proposed development. 6. The property is suitable in its natural state for the intended purpose and this lot split would not be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of future residents or of the community. 7. The applicant is not proposing any provisions for water-b d recreation. 8. The proposed lot layout is compatible with the e g yout of adjoining properties and the proposed lot lines are parallel an endicular to existing lot lines. Future development will not be constraine th osed lot layouts. 9. The proposed side lot lines are at right angl the ex road line and the property lines of the adjacent properties. 10. The property contains more than the 33- of minimum fronta public right- of-way. 11. The subject property meets the requi is he code f stormwater management. There is not a proposal to incr pervious surface coverage. 12. There are no public streets prqWsed within the opment. All members voted"aye". Motion carr APPLICANT: Steve h Quisber Applicants reques al Pla SuperVal ddition to Pequot Lakes Mr. Burshe expla e Staff port. The Fi lat acknowledges all the conditions of Preliminary Plat have b re w no conditions to the Preliminary Plat, the Planni sion to m ommendation to the City Council to approve applic We eed to receive the Title Opinion from the attorney and the p eck. Those will itted to Staff prior to the Council meeting. PUBLIC MENT: N A motion was y B' abein, seconded by Wesley Wilson, to approve the Final Plat of SuperValu n to Pequot Lakes, based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. The applica as complied with all of the conditions of the conditional use permit. There were no conditions of the preliminary plat approval. 2. A plat check for the development has not been submitted to the City. 3. The City Attorney has not indicated that adequate title insurance has been provided to assure all parties with an interest are represented. 4. There are no required improvements with this subdivision. 5. An independent land surveyor has not verified that the final document meets the statutory requirements. 6. No financial security is required. Minutes 3 Pequot Lakes Planning Commission November 15, 2012